Why Washington Shaped UFO History
Washington has an unusually central place in American UFO history. The modern “flying saucer” era began there on 24 June 1947, when private pilot Kenneth Arnold reported seeing nine fast-moving objects near Mount Rainier; within days, newspapers had turned his description into a national phrase.
Page outline Jump by section
Why Washington matters in UFO history
Washington’s importance starts with timing. Kenneth Arnold’s sighting came before Roswell became famous and before the US Air Force had a mature UFO investigation system. The Smithsonian’s National Air and Space Museum describes Arnold’s 1947 report as the moment that put “flying saucer” into public vocabulary, while the National Archives notes that Project Blue Book files include a page from Arnold’s 24 June 1947 Air Force report. [National Air and Space Museum]airandspace.si.edu1947 year flying saucer1947 year flying saucer
The state also matters because its landscape lends itself to ambiguous aerial observations. Mount Rainier, Mount Adams, the Cascade Range, Puget Sound, the Columbia Basin and the eastern sky around Hanford all create different sighting conditions: mountain lenticular clouds, bright planets low on the horizon, military and commercial aircraft routes, meteors, re-entry events, balloons, drones and reflections over water. That does not make every report worthless, but it does mean that Washington’s best-known cases need to be separated carefully from the looser body of anecdotal reports.
Washington’s UFO history has three broad layers:
- The founding legend: Kenneth Arnold near Mount Rainier in June 1947. [time.com]time.comThis Is Why People Think UFOs Look Like 'Flying SaucersThis Is Why People Think UFOs Look Like 'Flying Saucers
- The disputed companion legend: Maury Island, Harold Dahl, Fred Crisman and the claimed debris story.
- The long reporting culture: civilian reports through NUFORC, local investigators, military-adjacent sightings, and a continuing public appetite for unresolved aerial stories.
The key point is that Washington’s record is historically significant even where the physical evidence is poor. It helped shape the language, media habits and official responses that later surrounded UFOs across the United States.
Kenneth Arnold near Mount Rainier: the sighting that named an era
On 24 June 1947, Boise businessman and private pilot Kenneth Arnold was flying in Washington when he reported seeing nine unusual objects moving near Mount Rainier. He was not a casual sky-watcher on the ground: he was an experienced pilot, airborne in daylight, and he later gave a detailed account of the objects’ movement and apparent speed. His estimate of extraordinary velocity became one of the reasons the case attracted national attention. [National Air and Space Museum]airandspace.si.edu1947 year flying saucer1947 year flying saucer
What made the case famous was not simply what Arnold said he saw, but how it was reported. Arnold’s widely repeated description compared the objects’ motion to saucers skipping across water. Newspapers turned that into “flying saucers”, a phrase that suggested disc-shaped craft and soon became shorthand for a new category of aerial mystery. TIME’s retrospective on the phrase stresses that the saucer image came from reporting and popular interpretation, not necessarily from Arnold saying the objects were literal saucers. [Time]time.comThis Is Why People Think UFOs Look Like 'Flying SaucersThis Is Why People Think UFOs Look Like 'Flying Saucers
The case remains unresolved in a strict historical sense because there is no recovered object, no radar record that settles the question, and no photograph of the objects. The strongest evidence is Arnold’s own testimony, the timing of his report, and the fact that his account quickly entered official and press channels. The main doubts are equally clear: estimates of distance, size and speed from a moving aircraft are fragile; mountain atmospherics can mislead; and later retellings often overstate the precision of the original evidence.
Sceptical explanations have included mirage effects, formations of birds, reflections, or lenticular clouds. HistoryLink, a Washington history resource, notes that later analysts dismissed related early “saucer” imagery such as the Ryman photograph as a weather balloon and that an Air Force investigation treated Arnold’s sighting as a possible mirage or cluster of disc-shaped lenticular clouds over mountain peaks. [historylink.org]historylink.orgSource details in endnotes.
Yet the case cannot be dismissed as irrelevant. Its importance lies in the way it crystallised a national pattern: a credible-sounding witness, a startling claim, a vivid phrase, a burst of media attention, then a wave of similar reports. Washington’s role was not just to host one famous sighting; it supplied the origin story for how modern American UFO culture learned to speak.
Maury Island: culturally powerful, evidentially weak
The Maury Island incident is often presented as if it happened just before Arnold’s sighting, on 21 June 1947, when Tacoma resident Harold Dahl allegedly saw flying discs near Vashon-Maury Island in Puget Sound. The core story claims that one object dropped strange material, injuring a person on Dahl’s boat and killing a dog; Dahl then supposedly received a warning from a man in a black suit. Fred Crisman later became part of the story, and Arnold was drawn into the matter after his own Mount Rainier report made him famous. [lawfilesext.leg.wa.gov]lawfilesext.leg.wa.gov8648 Maury Island Incident8648 Maury Island Incident
This is where Washington’s UFO history becomes complicated. Maury Island is important to folklore, film, local festivals and the later “men in black” motif, but it is not strong evidence for an extraordinary aerial event. The story is burdened by inconsistent testimony, sensational claims, disputed debris and later claims of hoaxing. Even summaries sympathetic to the incident usually have to concede that the case is difficult to separate from publicity, pulp publishing and post-war saucer excitement.
The most serious real-world tragedy attached to the story came after Air Force intelligence officers Captain William L. Davidson and Lieutenant Frank M. Brown investigated and left with material connected to the case. Their B-25 crashed near Kelso, Washington, killing them. That crash gave the story a sombre gravity it otherwise might not have had, but a fatal crash does not by itself validate the debris claim or the alleged sighting. The Washington State Senate’s 2017 resolution acknowledged the 70th anniversary of the Maury Island story and the deaths of Davidson and Brown, but the resolution’s wording repeatedly uses “allegedly” for the sighting claims. [lawfilesext.leg.wa.gov]lawfilesext.leg.wa.govOpen source on wa.gov.
For readers trying to judge the case, the balance is straightforward. Maury Island matters as a Washington cultural landmark and as part of early UFO mythology. It is much weaker as an evidential case. The responsible assessment is that it is disputed, probably contaminated by hoax elements, and valuable mainly for what it reveals about how quickly UFO narratives could merge with secrecy, danger and media opportunity in the summer of 1947.
Hanford and the nuclear-age sky
Washington’s UFO record also intersects with the nuclear age through Hanford, the plutonium production site in south-eastern Washington. Reports of unusual aerial objects near atomic facilities became part of Cold War UFO lore, and Hanford is often included in discussions of that pattern. Search results and historical summaries connect Hanford with late-1940s “green fireball” concerns and later reports during the early Cold War, though the evidence varies sharply in quality. [Wikipedia]WikipediaMaury Island incidentMaury Island incident
The attraction of Hanford in UFO narratives is obvious: it was secretive, strategically important and tied to nuclear weapons production. In the early Cold War, unexplained lights near such a facility could be read as a possible foreign aircraft, a natural phenomenon, a security breach, or something more exotic. That range of possible interpretations is precisely why official attention to UFOs was initially framed around national security, not aliens.
Project Blue Book and related Air Force investigations were designed to ask whether UFO reports represented a threat or unknown technology. The US Air Force says that from 1947 to 1969 it investigated 12,618 sightings, with 701 remaining “unidentified” when the programme ended; it also says the project was terminated in December 1969. The National Archives confirms that Project Blue Book records are declassified and that the project closed in 1969. [U.S. Air Force]af.milunidentified flying objects and air force project blue bookunidentified flying objects and air force project blue book
For Washington, the Hanford connection is best treated as a serious historical context rather than a settled mystery. A sighting near a nuclear site is not automatically extraordinary; it may simply be more likely to be reported, investigated or remembered. At the same time, the combination of restricted airspace, military concern and incomplete public records makes these cases more interesting than ordinary light-in-the-sky reports. The strongest conclusion is modest: Hanford helped place Washington UFO reports inside the Cold War security imagination, but it does not provide public proof of non-human craft.
Reporting clusters and the NUFORC effect
Modern Washington UFO history cannot be understood without the National UFO Reporting Center, commonly known as NUFORC. It is a civilian reporting organisation rather than an official verification body, and its database is built from witness submissions. NUFORC describes its databank as a large independently collected set of UFO/UAP sighting reports available online, while its Washington index includes entries from many towns and years, including recent reports from Auburn, Spokane, Bremerton, Bothell and other locations. [NUFORC]nuforc.orgData Bank | NUFORCData Bank | NUFORC
Washington has repeatedly been described as unusually active in per-capita sighting reports. Axios Seattle reported in 2022, using NUFORC data, that Washington ranked first in the United States for UFO sightings per capita, with 6,812 reports at that time and entries dating back to the 1940s. That ranking is interesting, but it should not be confused with a ranking of verified unexplained craft. It measures reporting behaviour as much as phenomena in the sky. [Axios]axios.comSource details in endnotes.
There are plausible reasons Washington would generate many reports. The state has large rural and coastal viewing areas, major aviation corridors, military installations, a long UFO tradition, active local media interest, and a population familiar with the Kenneth Arnold origin story. Once a state has a strong UFO identity, people may also be more likely to report ambiguous sightings instead of ignoring them.
NUFORC entries are still useful, provided they are read carefully. They can reveal patterns in what people think they are seeing: triangles, lights, discs, fireballs, hovering objects, fast-moving points and formation lights. They can also show how reports cluster around new technologies. In recent decades, drones, satellite trains, Chinese lanterns, LED balloons and aircraft lighting have all complicated witness interpretation. The database is therefore an archive of public observation and perception, not a catalogue of confirmed anomalies.
Military and aviation links around Puget Sound
Washington’s UFO stories often gravitate towards military and aviation settings: Mount Rainier and Arnold’s aircraft; McChord Field in the Maury Island aftermath; Naval Air Station Whidbey Island; Joint Base Lewis-McChord; and broader Puget Sound airspace. That is unsurprising. UFO reports become more compelling to the public when trained observers, aircraft, radar, restricted airspace or military facilities are nearby.
Whidbey Island has produced local reporting and witness interest, including accounts of unexplained lights above Puget Sound and older reports near the naval air station. Local news coverage in 2013 described an Oak Harbor couple seeing an unidentified object above Puget Sound, and other Whidbey-area articles show that local UFO talks can still draw sizeable audiences. [South Whidbey Record]southwhidbeyrecord.comSouth Whidbey Record More UFOs spotted over Whidbey Island skiesSouth Whidbey Record More UFOs spotted over Whidbey Island skies
The important distinction is between proximity and causation. A sighting near a base is not automatically a military event, and a military area may increase ordinary explanations: training flights, flares, aircraft on approach, helicopters, test activity, or restricted operations that are not publicly explained in detail. Conversely, military witnesses can sometimes provide better observational detail than casual witnesses. Each case has to be judged on its own records, not by the romance of the location.
The Federal Aviation Administration’s current language also matters. FAA air traffic guidance now refers to “Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena (UAP) Reports” and tells personnel to inform the operations supervisor or controller-in-charge of reported or observed UAP/unexplained phenomena activity. That does not endorse extraordinary claims; it shows that ambiguous aerial reports are treated as operational information that may affect air safety. [FAA]faa.govSource details in endnotes.
What usually weakens a Washington UFO claim?
Washington’s best-known cases show the same recurring weaknesses found in UFO history elsewhere, but the state’s weather, terrain and airspace make some of them especially important.
Distance and speed estimates are often unreliable. Arnold’s case is famous partly because of the estimated speed, but speed depends on assumed size and distance. Without independent tracking, a witness can mistake a nearer small object for a farther large one, or a slow object for a fast one.
Mountain weather can create striking visual effects. Lenticular clouds, mirage-like effects, sun glints and unusual cloud forms near Cascade peaks are recurring conventional explanations. These do not explain every report, but they are highly relevant to Mount Rainier and Mount Adams cases.
Single-witness reports are hard to test. A careful, sincere witness can still misidentify an object. Without photographs, radar, multiple independent observers, or matching aviation and astronomy data, even honest reports often remain unresolved only because the evidence is incomplete.
Local folklore can reshape memory. Once Washington became associated with “flying saucers”, later witnesses and storytellers had a ready-made frame. Maury Island is the clearest example: the story’s cultural life has become stronger than its evidential base.
Databases preserve claims, not verdicts. NUFORC and similar archives are valuable because they keep reports available, but a database entry is not the same as a confirmed anomaly. It records what was submitted, not necessarily what happened.
What strengthens a case?
The most persuasive Washington UFO material is not necessarily the most dramatic. A strong case would usually have several of these features:
- independent witnesses in different locations;
- precise time, direction, altitude and duration;
- matching radar, flight-tracking, satellite or astronomical checks;
- unedited images or video with metadata;
- prompt reporting before media contamination;
- a clear chain of custody for any alleged physical material;
- willingness to consider ordinary explanations first.
This is why Kenneth Arnold remains historically important but not evidentially conclusive. He was an experienced pilot and reported promptly, but the case lacks the independent technical data needed to settle what he saw. Maury Island is weaker because its story depends on contested testimony, alleged debris and later narrative complications. Modern database reports can be useful for pattern analysis, but most individual entries do not reach the evidential standard needed for a firm conclusion.
NASA’s 2023 independent UAP study captured the broader problem well: many UAP accounts exist, but high-quality observations are limited, and data quality is central to scientific progress. That observation applies directly to Washington, where the history is rich but the evidence is uneven. [NASA Science]science.nasa.govScience Independent Study Team ReportScience Independent Study Team Report
How official investigations changed the frame
The language around UFOs has changed from “flying saucers” to “UFOs” to “UAP”, but the core official question has remained similar: what is in the sky, and does it pose a risk? Project Blue Book’s public-era work ended in 1969. The Air Force’s summary says that no UFO investigated by the Air Force gave an indication of a threat to national security, and that no evidence showed “unidentified” cases represented technological developments or principles beyond modern scientific knowledge. [ESD]whs.milESDIMMEDIATE RELEASEESDIMMEDIATE RELEASE
More recent US government reviews have been similarly cautious. The All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, or AARO, says it leads the US government’s UAP work using a scientific and data-driven approach. AARO’s 2024 historical review found no evidence that any US government investigation, academic-sponsored research or official review panel confirmed a UAP sighting as extraterrestrial technology. [AARO]aaro.milOpen source on aaro.mil.
That does not mean all cases are explained. It means “unidentified” should be read literally: not identified from the available data. It is a category of uncertainty, not a hidden category of proof. For Washington’s UFO history, this distinction is crucial. Arnold’s sighting, Hanford-era reports, Whidbey accounts and modern NUFORC entries can be historically meaningful without being treated as confirmed evidence of alien craft.
Washington’s most useful takeaway
Washington is one of the few states that can claim a genuine founding role in modern UFO history. Kenneth Arnold’s Mount Rainier report helped create the flying saucer era; Maury Island helped seed a darker folklore of secrecy and “men in black”; Hanford and military-adjacent reports tied the subject to Cold War security; and NUFORC has kept Washington prominent in modern sighting culture.
The strongest evidence in the state’s record is not physical proof of non-human technology. It is the documented historical impact of reports, witnesses, official files, local memory and continuing public reporting. The main doubts are equally important: weak physical evidence, changing testimony, difficult viewing conditions, media amplification and the tendency to treat “unidentified” as more conclusive than it is.
Washington’s UFO history is therefore best understood as a layered record: partly aviation history, partly Cold War history, partly folklore, partly unresolved observation. Its stories matter because they show how a single state helped turn strange things in the sky into one of the most persistent public mysteries of the modern age.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to Why Washington Shaped UFO History. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects
Provides context for major Washington-related UFO cases.
The Flying Saucers are Real
Captures the atmosphere of the post-Kenneth Arnold period.
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Example marketplace items related to this page. Use the search link to explore similar finds on eBay.
Endnotes
-
Source: axios.com
Link: https://www.axios.com/local/seattle/2022/07/28/washington-state-ufo-sightings -
Source: archives.gov
Title: project blue book 50th anniversary
Link: https://www.archives.gov/news/articles/project-blue-book-50th-anniversary -
Source: time.com
Title: This Is Why People Think UFOs Look Like ‘Flying Saucers’
Link: https://time.com/3930602/first-reported-ufo/ -
Source: historylink.org
Link: https://www.historylink.org/file/2067 -
Source: lawfilesext.leg.wa.gov
Title: 8648 Maury Island Incident
Link: https://lawfilesext.leg.wa.gov/biennium/2017-18/Pdf/Bills/Senate%20Resolutions/8648-Maury%20Island%20Incident.pdf -
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Maury Island incident
Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maury_Island_incident -
Source: lawfilesext.leg.wa.gov
Link: https://lawfilesext.leg.wa.gov/biennium/2017-18/Htm/Bills/Senate%20Resolutions/8648-Maury%20Island%20Incident.htm -
Source: Wikipedia
Title: UFO reports and atomic sites
Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/UFO_reports_and_atomic_sites -
Source: archives.gov
Title: National Archives Project BLUE BOOK
Link: https://www.archives.gov/research/military/air-force/ufos -
Source: nuforc.org
Title: Data Bank | NUFORC
Link: https://nuforc.org/databank/ -
Source: nuforc.org
Link: https://nuforc.org/subndx/?id=lWA -
Source: faa.gov
Link: https://www.faa.gov/air_traffic/publications/atpubs/atc_html/chap9_section_8.html -
Source: science.nasa.gov
Title: Science Independent Study Team Report
Link: https://science.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/uap-independent-study-team-final-report.pdf -
Source: science.nasa.gov
Link: https://science.nasa.gov/uap/ -
Source: aaro.mil
Link: https://www.aaro.mil/ -
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Kenneth Arnold UFO sighting
Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kenneth_Arnold_UFO_sighting -
Source: Wikipedia
Title: List of reported UFO sightings
Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_reported_UFO_sightings -
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Project Blue Book
Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Blue_Book -
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Flying saucer
Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Flying_saucer -
Source: Wikipedia
Title: National UFO Reporting Center
Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/National_UFO_Reporting_Center -
Source: Wikipedia
Title: NASA Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Independent Study Team
Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NASA_Unidentified_Anomalous_Phenomena_Independent_Study_Team -
Source: archives.gov
Link: https://www.archives.gov/research/alic/periodicals/nara-citations/genealogy.html -
Source: archives.gov
Link: https://www.archives.gov/files/research/jfk/releases/2018/180-10085-10264.pdf -
Source: prologue.blogs.archives.gov
Title: saucers over washington the history of project blue book
Link: https://prologue.blogs.archives.gov/2019/12/19/saucers-over-washington-the-history-of-project-blue-book/ -
Source: archives.gov
Link: https://www.archives.gov/research/topics/uaps -
Source: lawfilesext.leg.wa.gov
Link: https://lawfilesext.leg.wa.gov/Law/Journals/2017/SJ_17_100.htm -
Source: nuforc.org
Link: https://nuforc.org/sighting/?id=185536 -
Source: nuforc.org
Link: https://nuforc.org/sighting/?id=27457 -
Source: nuforc.org
Link: https://nuforc.org/ -
Source: nuforc.org
Link: https://nuforc.org/sighting/?id=164134 -
Source: nuforc.org
Link: https://nuforc.org/sighting/?id=131140 -
Source: nuforc.org
Title: NUFOR C Reports by Location NUFORC Reports by Location; USA
Link: https://nuforc.org/ndx/?id=loc -
Source: nuforc.org
Link: https://nuforc.org/sighting/?id=159142 -
Source: nuforc.org
Link: https://nuforc.org/sighting/?id=102706 -
Source: nuforc.org
Link: https://nuforc.org/sighting/?id=24106 -
Source: nuforc.org
Link: https://nuforc.org/map/ -
Source: nuforc.org
Link: https://nuforc.org/sighting/?id=190375 -
Source: nuforc.org
Link: https://nuforc.org/sighting/?id=144348 -
Source: war.gov
Title: 65 hs1 834228961 62 hq 83894 section 3
Link: https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/release_1/65_hs1-834228961_62-hq-83894_section_3.pdf -
Source: war.gov
Title: dod report discounts sightings of extraterrestrial technology
Link: https://www.war.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/3701297/dod-report-discounts-sightings-of-extraterrestrial-technology/ -
Source: science.nasa.gov
Link: https://science.nasa.gov/uap/faqs/ -
Source: aaro.mil
Link: https://www.aaro.mil/UAP-Cases/Official-UAP-Imagery/ -
Source: space.com
Title: nasa astronaut scott kelly ufos uap worth investigating
Link: https://www.space.com/nasa-astronaut-scott-kelly-ufos-uap-worth-investigating -
Source: history.com
Title: Kenneth Arnold
Link: https://www.history.com/articles/kenneth-arnold -
Source: youtube.com
Title: Kenneth Arnold and the First UFOs
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qdXNAOxs6moSource snippet
The Maury Island Incident...
-
Source: youtube.com
Title: The Maury Island Incident
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=isizjCOkppoSource snippet
TOSC - Shadows Over Puget Sound: The Maury Island UFO Mystery...
-
Source: airandspace.si.edu
Title: 1947 year flying saucer
Link: https://airandspace.si.edu/stories/editorial/1947-year-flying-saucer -
Source: af.mil
Title: unidentified flying objects and air force project blue book
Link: https://www.af.mil/About-Us/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/104590/unidentified-flying-objects-and-air-force-project-blue-book/ -
Source: southwhidbeyrecord.com
Title: South Whidbey Record More UFOs spotted over Whidbey Island skies
Link: https://www.southwhidbeyrecord.com/2013/08/16/more-ufos-spotted-over-whidbey-island-skies/ -
Source: documents.theblackvault.com
Title: Kenneth Arnold
Link: https://documents.theblackvault.com/documents/MUFON/Pratt/KennethArnold.pdf -
Source: britannica.com
Title: Project Blue Book
Link: https://www.britannica.com/topic/Project-Blue-Book -
Source: ufodatalive.com
Link: https://www.ufodatalive.com/states/washington/ -
Source: quadrant45.com
Title: The Maury Island Incident
Link: https://www.quadrant45.com/mauryislandincident -
Source: spacedoutclassroom.com
Title: maury island incident
Link: https://spacedoutclassroom.com/tag/maury-island-incident/
Additional References
-
Source: youtube.com
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=01sVLTO8xmoSource snippet
Kenneth Arnold and the First UFOs - Jimmy Akin's Mysterious World...
Published: June 1947
-
Source: youtube.com
Title: “The Maury Island Incident” Trailer #1
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FurQ7MEGSTESource snippet
This historical retrospective on Kenneth Arnold's 1947 Flight documents the foundational Pacific Northwest sighting near Mount Rainier th...
-
Source: academia.edu
Link: https://www.academia.edu/7482584/Project_Blue_Book_Archive -
Source: archivesfoundation.org
Link: https://archivesfoundation.org/documents/50-years-ago-government-stops-investigating-ufos/ -
Source: aiaa.org
Link: https://aiaa.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/08/AIAA-UAPIOC-Opinion-Paper-UAP-Occupational-Safety-Reporting_ForPublication_kb.pdf -
Source: medium.com
Link: https://medium.com/data-science/data-analysis-everything-youve-ever-wanted-to-know-about-ufo-sightings-e16f2ed34151 -
Source: facebook.com
Link: https://www.facebook.com/groups/379569529068459/posts/1308650612827008/ -
Source: okcfox.com
Link: https://okcfox.com/news/nation-world/fact-check-team-pentagon-releases-new-ufo-files-but-no-evidence-of-aliens-found-extraterrestrial-military-space-nasa-particles-declassified-mars -
Source: reddit.com
Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1fqfgfh/if_flying_saucer_is_a_misreport_of_kenneth/ -
Source: instagram.com
Link: https://www.instagram.com/reel/C8qONrWvJQw/
Topic Tree
Follow this branch
Related pages 49
- Connecticut UFOs
- Illinois UFOs
- Maryland UFOs
- Michigan UFOs
- Mississippi UFOs
- +44 more in sidebar