Inside the 2000 St. Clair Triangle UFO Event

Introduction

The St. Clair Triangle is one of Illinois’s most durable UFO cases because it was not just a lone report of lights in the sky. In the early hours of 5 January 2000, a civilian in Highland and several police officers across the Metro East area reported a large, mostly silent object moving across southern Illinois, apparently from the Highland/Summerfield area towards Shiloh, Millstadt and Dupo. The case matters because much of it unfolded over police radio, with officers in different towns comparing what they were seeing in real time. It is still unresolved, but not because every detail is equally strong. The strongest evidence is the clustered police testimony and dispatch record; the weakest parts are the poor photograph, conflicting shape descriptions, uncertain radar claims, and the lack of any confirmed physical or aviation record proving what the object was. [Center for UFO Studies]cufos.orgCenter for UFO Studies [Center for UFO Studies]cufos.orgCenter for UFO Studies

Within Illinois UFO history, the event sits between older newspaper-era sightings and later high-profile cases such as the 2006 O’Hare incident. It is also a classic “black triangle” case: a large dark object, low apparent altitude, unusual lights, slow movement, and reported silence. That pattern has produced both UFO interest and sceptical pushback, especially because airships, aircraft seen at odd angles, and witness-perception errors can all create misleading impressions at night.

What happened before dawn on 5 January 2000?

The sighting began with Melvern Noll, a Highland miniature golf course owner who was checking his business at around 4 a.m. in cold winter conditions. According to David B. Marler’s March 2000 account in the MUFON UFO Journal, Noll first noticed what seemed to be a bright star in the north-eastern sky, then realised it was moving and appeared to be part of a much larger dark object. Noll described something rectangular rather than triangular: like a two-storey house in the sky, with bright white “windows” and dim red lights underneath. He estimated a low altitude, a slow passage, and a sighting lasting about five minutes. [Center for UFO Studies]cufos.orgCenter for UFO Studies

Noll then drove to the Highland police station rather than simply telling friends or local media. That decision is important. It turned a private sighting into an operational police call. The Highland dispatcher treated him as rational enough to pass the report to Lebanon police, where Officer Ed Barton initially responded with scepticism. Barton’s own later observation became the hinge of the case: once a police officer reported seeing something unusual, other departments were alerted and the event became a cross-town tracking episode rather than an isolated anecdote. [Center for UFO Studies]cufos.orgCenter for UFO Studies

The main reported sequence moved west and south-west through small communities east of St Louis: Highland, Summerfield, Lebanon, Shiloh, Millstadt and Dupo. MUFON’s reconstruction placed the apparent flight path near Scott Air Force Base, which helped push the story beyond local curiosity into a state and national media event. [Center for UFO Studies]cufos.orgCenter for UFO Studies

Why the police accounts carry unusual weight

Police witnesses do not automatically make a UFO case true, but they do change how the evidence should be weighed. Officers are accustomed to observing vehicles, aircraft, distances, lights and directions under imperfect conditions. They also risk embarrassment when filing strange reports. In this case, the officers were not all standing together and reinforcing one another’s first impressions; they were spread across different towns and communicating by radio as the reports unfolded. Later analysis of local coverage noted that the police witnesses had little obvious benefit from coming forward and that the dispatch tapes gave the case a sense of immediacy beyond retrospective interviews. [WebStarts]files.secure.websiteWeb Starts Triangular UFOs: An Estimate of the SituationWeb Starts Triangular UFOs: An Estimate of the Situation

Officer Ed Barton’s report is one of the most cited. He described two brilliant white lights in the north-eastern sky that later seemed to resolve into an elongated triangular or narrow triangular object. He estimated it at roughly 1,000 feet above the ground, noticed bright white lights and a smaller red flashing light, and said the object appeared to block out stars as it passed. He also said it did not move like a conventional aircraft when it rotated, appearing to pivot in the air rather than bank. [Center for UFO Studies]cufos.orgCenter for UFO Studies

Shiloh Officer David Martin gave a broadly similar but not identical account. He described three bright white lights shining downward from an object shaped like an extra-wide triangle or arrowhead, plus smaller red and green lights on the rear. Martin estimated the object at about 1,000 feet and thought it was around a quarter of a mile away. He reported no sound, despite lowering his window to listen, and estimated an initial slow speed followed by a much faster departure. [Center for UFO Studies]cufos.orgCenter for UFO Studies

Millstadt Officer Craig Stevens added another major account. After hearing radio traffic, he drove to the edge of town and saw what he described as a very large, roughly triangular object, perhaps 500 to 1,000 feet high. Unlike some other witnesses, Stevens reported a faint low buzzing sound. He described white lights at the rear, a single red light underneath, and a slightly recessed rear shape. He also took a Polaroid photograph, but the result showed only dim, blurry lights and is not strong visual evidence by itself. [Center for UFO Studies]cufos.orgCenter for UFO Studies

The Dupo report is the least secure of the main police sightings. The Dupo officer, later discussed without his name in Marler’s account, saw lights at a higher apparent altitude and through binoculars. He reportedly could not discern a clear size or shape, only a group of lights, and other analysis has suggested that this may not have been the same object at all. That matters because the case is often retold as though every police sighting cleanly confirms the same craft; the original material is messier. [Center for UFO Studies]cufos.orgCenter for UFO Studies

The dispatch tapes make the case harder to dismiss

The most valuable feature of the St. Clair Triangle case is not the later television treatment, the cultural afterlife, or the dramatic drawings. It is the police radio record. In the released dispatch material, officers and dispatchers discuss the moving object as a live problem: where it is, whether it resembles a plane, whether Scott Air Force Base should be contacted, whether it is heading towards Lambert Field, and whether another department can see it too. [Center for UFO Studies]cufos.orgCenter for UFO Studies

That record helps in three ways. First, it fixes parts of the chronology. Barton was responding around 4:10 to 4:15 a.m.; Shiloh was involved shortly afterwards; Millstadt reported seeing an object by about 4:29 a.m.; and Dupo became relevant later in the sequence. Second, it shows that at least some officers were sceptical or uncertain in the moment, not simply telling a polished UFO story afterwards. Third, it preserves discrepancies that later retellings often smooth over, including uncertainty about whether the object was a plane, its altitude, and whether every later light cluster was the same thing. [Center for UFO Studies]cufos.orgCenter for UFO Studies [Center for UFO Studies]cufos.orgCenter for UFO Studies

The radio record also explains why the case spread. A private report can be forgotten. A police radio chain creates multiple named observers, time stamps, cross-checking between jurisdictions, and a trail for investigators and journalists. This is why the St. Clair Triangle became a pillar case in Illinois UFO history rather than another single-entry sighting report.

The shape problem: one object, several descriptions

The case is often summarised as a “large triangular craft”, but that simplification hides one of the central difficulties. Noll’s first description was rectangular, almost house-like, with window-like rows. Barton described a narrow triangular form, longer than wide. Martin described an extra-wide triangle or arrowhead. Stevens described a large triangular object with a recessed or concave rear. The Dupo officer saw lights but could not confirm a clear shape. [Center for UFO Studies]cufos.orgCenter for UFO Studies [Center for UFO Studies]cufos.orgCenter for UFO Studies [Center for UFO Studies]cufos.orgCenter for UFO Studies

There are several ways to interpret that spread:

Changing viewing angle. A single dark object could look rectangular from one side, triangular from below or behind, and like a group of lights at long distance. Night sightings make this harder because witnesses often infer shape from lights and from the absence of visible stars.

Different objects. The reports may not all describe the same thing. The later Dupo account is especially vulnerable to this possibility because the object was described as higher and more like a distant cluster of lights than a low structured craft.

Witness error under unusual conditions. Even careful observers can misjudge size, altitude and speed at night. A bright light against a dark sky gives few reliable distance cues, and once one department is primed to look for something unusual, ordinary aircraft can become part of the same narrative.

A genuinely unusual object. The reports from Barton, Martin and Stevens are similar enough in their core claims — large, low, bright, slow, oddly shaped, and not behaving like a normal aircraft — that the case cannot be dismissed simply by pointing to one inconsistent detail.

The best reading is therefore cautious: the event contains a strong cluster of unusual witness reports, but the record does not prove a single, solid triangular craft tracked cleanly from town to town.

The photograph is real but not decisive

Officer Stevens’s Polaroid is often treated as one of the case’s most tangible pieces of evidence. It is tangible, but not decisive. MUFON reproduced the image as a dark frame with a few small light marks, and later discussion has repeatedly acknowledged that the photograph is too poor to establish the size, shape, altitude or identity of the object. [Center for UFO Studies]cufos.orgCenter for UFO Studies

That weakness is understandable. Stevens was trying to photograph lights in the sky before dawn, in very cold conditions, with a Polaroid camera taken from a squad car. The technical limitations are obvious: low light, motion, uncertain focus, no reliable scale, and no surrounding landscape detail. The picture supports the claim that Stevens saw and attempted to document something, but it does not independently prove that the object was a large craft.

This is a common pattern in UFO evidence. A photograph can be emotionally persuasive because it feels physical, yet analytically weak because it lacks reference points. In the St. Clair case, the photograph should be treated as corroborative context for Stevens’s testimony, not as proof of the object’s structure.

Scott Air Force Base made the story more intriguing but not solved

Scott Air Force Base sits close enough to the reported route that it naturally became part of the story. Marler’s MUFON article described the apparent path as passing roughly one to two miles north of the base, and later discussions focused on whether Scott had radar data, aircraft activity, or any explanation for a large object nearby. [Center for UFO Studies]cufos.orgCenter for UFO Studies

The base’s relevance should be handled carefully. Scott is not a tiny or irrelevant airstrip. The 375th Air Mobility Wing’s official description says its mission includes C-21 aircraft and partnerships involving KC-135 and C-40 missions, with aeromedical evacuation, senior leader airlift and air refuelling roles. That makes local aviation activity a reasonable line of inquiry. [scott.af.mil]scott.af.milAbout UsAbout Us

However, proximity to a military base is not evidence of a secret aircraft. It only means that conventional military air traffic, radar records, tower staffing, and public-affairs responses matter. Marler reported receiving an official response indicating that Scott’s only calls were from media, that no ground observers at the base had come forward, that the base did not track objects on radar because radar services were provided by the FAA at Lambert-St Louis International Airport, and that the base was not operating any aircraft resembling the reports. [Center for UFO Studies]cufos.orgCenter for UFO Studies

Later commentary has treated those radar and base-operation statements as suspicious or contradictory. That is a legitimate question to raise, but it is not the same as evidence of a cover-up. The sober conclusion is that the Scott AFB angle remains an unresolved documentation gap: relevant, frustrating, but not conclusive.

Could it have been an aircraft?

A conventional aircraft explanation has some strengths. The area is near St Louis aviation corridors, Scott AFB, and Lambert-St Louis International Airport. At night, bright landing lights can appear to hover when an aircraft is coming towards an observer, then seem to move rapidly when its angle changes. Navigation lights can also create colour patterns. Federal aircraft lighting rules require red and green forward position lights and a white rear position light, which is relevant to reports involving red, green and white lights. [eCFR]ecfr.goveCFR:: 14 CFR Part 25 Subpart F - Lights (FAR Part 25 Subpart F - ECFR0cb7970b9d1fd5f)…

But a simple aircraft explanation also has problems. Barton, Martin and Stevens each described a large apparent structure, not merely point lights. Barton and Martin reported unusual motion or rapid departure. Stevens reported a very low apparent altitude and a faint buzzing rather than normal engine noise. Several witnesses described the object as silent or nearly silent when it seemed close. [Center for UFO Studies]cufos.orgCenter for UFO Studies

The aircraft explanation is strongest for the Dupo report, where the officer saw distant lights at a higher altitude and could not confirm shape. It is weaker for the earlier police reports if those distance and altitude estimates were anywhere near accurate. The key uncertainty is whether those estimates were reliable. At night, without a known object size, witnesses can easily misjudge altitude and speed; yet dismissing all the trained observers’ impressions as ordinary aircraft misperception also feels too easy.

Could it have been a blimp?

The most common sceptical explanation is an advertising blimp or airship. It has obvious appeal. A blimp can be large, slow, quiet, brightly lit, and visually strange at night. The region had connections to advertising airship operations, and sceptical writers have argued that such craft have a long history of generating UFO reports. Skeptoid’s account, for example, identifies the American Blimp Company and later Van Wagner Airship Group as central to the blimp hypothesis. [skeptoid.com]skeptoid.comSource details in endnotes.

The blimp theory also fits some witness language better than a plane does. A large illuminated side, slow motion, low engine noise, and apparent “windows” could plausibly arise from an advertising lightship seen in darkness. If a witness were viewing the side or rear of an airship, the shape might be misread as rectangular, cigar-like, arrowhead-like or triangular depending on lighting and angle.

But the blimp explanation is not airtight. The Debrief’s 2022 review noted that investigators checked with American Blimp Company and later Van Wagner and did not find a record of a relevant flight for that date. It also pointed out that reported hovering, stopping, turning and sudden acceleration are hard to square with ordinary blimp performance, though some of the most dramatic acceleration claims may be softened when the radio record is examined closely. [The Debrief]thedebrief.orgthe st clair triangle ufo incident of 2000 a fresh lookthe st clair triangle ufo incident of 2000 a fresh look

The fair assessment is that a blimp remains one of the most plausible conventional explanations for parts of the case, especially Noll’s “flying house” description and the slow, quiet passage. It does not fully explain the strongest police claims unless those claims involved substantial misperception of distance, angle and speed.

Media attention strengthened the witnesses but blurred the evidence

The St. Clair Triangle quickly became a media story. Local papers covered the officers and civilian witnesses in January 2000; later television documentaries and UFO programmes turned it into a national case. Marler’s later book-length discussion notes that early press coverage took the witnesses relatively seriously, partly because police officers were central and partly because Scott Air Force Base gave the story a possible military frame that felt more plausible to mainstream audiences than an extraterrestrial one. [WebStarts]files.secure.websiteWeb Starts Triangular UFOs: An Estimate of the SituationWeb Starts Triangular UFOs: An Estimate of the Situation

That attention had two opposite effects. On the positive side, it preserved interviews, sketches, maps and radio recordings that might otherwise have disappeared. The case is much better documented than many local UFO stories precisely because reporters and investigators arrived quickly. On the negative side, television retellings tended to compress the event into a cleaner and more dramatic image: a classic black triangle with lights at its corners, sweeping silently over Illinois.

The original record is more interesting than the simplified legend. It contains a rectangular “house”, a narrow triangle, an arrowhead, a concave rear, a low buzzing sound, silence, a poor photograph, possible aircraft-like lights, and an uncertain Dupo sighting. That mixture does not weaken the case to zero, but it does mean the popular image of a single perfectly described craft is not what the evidence actually shows.

What later reporting changed

Later reporting has mostly refined the case rather than solved it. The strongest later contribution is the re-emphasis on original source material: dispatch recordings, early interviews, sketches, and the timing of police radio traffic. That source-based approach tends to strengthen the case as a genuine multi-witness event, while weakening some of the more dramatic claims that accumulated around it. [The Debrief]thedebrief.orgthe st clair triangle ufo incident of 2000 a fresh lookthe st clair triangle ufo incident of 2000 a fresh look

For example, later analysis points out that Barton’s famous “impossible acceleration” claim is more complicated than it first appears. In the radio record, he was reaching into his squad car for the microphone and then saw the object much farther away, which leaves room for a mistaken impression of extreme speed rather than a directly observed physics-defying burst. [The Debrief]thedebrief.orgthe st clair triangle ufo incident of 2000 a fresh lookthe st clair triangle ufo incident of 2000 a fresh look

Later work has also introduced a more complex possibility: that not all reports belonged to one object. Marler’s broader triangular UFO research later argued that additional witness material may call the single-object theory into question, even suggesting multiple objects in the area. That is intriguing, but it also raises the evidential burden. Multiple objects could explain differing descriptions, but it can also make the case harder to test because it reduces the discipline of a single flight path. [WebStarts]files.secure.websiteWeb Starts Triangular UFOs: An Estimate of the SituationWeb Starts Triangular UFOs: An Estimate of the Situation

In short, later reporting has strengthened the case as an important Illinois UFO episode but weakened overly tidy versions of the story.

How to weigh the case today

The St. Clair Triangle should be classified as unresolved, not confirmed. It is stronger than a typical anecdotal sighting because it includes multiple police witnesses, cross-jurisdictional radio traffic, early documentation, sketches, and a photograph taken during the event. It is weaker than its reputation sometimes suggests because the visual evidence is poor, the descriptions vary, the radar situation is unclear, and no confirmed aircraft, blimp, military or physical record has settled the matter.

The most reasonable evidence-based position is:

That balance is why the St. Clair Triangle remains central to Illinois UFO history. It is neither a debunked hoax nor proof of an extraordinary craft. It is a well-documented, contested case where the best evidence still comes from ordinary public systems — police dispatch, local reporting, witness interviews — rather than from secret files or dramatic imagery.

Why the St. Clair Triangle still matters in Illinois UFO history

For Illinois, the St. Clair Triangle is important because it shows how a UFO case becomes historically durable. It had a tight time window, identifiable towns, named officers, a plausible route, a nearby military base, media attention, sceptical explanations, and unresolved gaps. Those features allow later readers to test claims against a record, not just repeat folklore.

It also offers a useful lesson for the wider Illinois project. UFO history is not only about asking whether a sighting was “real” or “fake”. The better question is what kind of evidence survives and what it can support. In this case, the evidence supports a genuine cluster of unusual reports over southern Illinois before dawn on 5 January 2000. It does not support certainty about alien origin, secret aircraft, or any single definitive explanation.

The St. Clair Triangle therefore remains one of the state’s most valuable case studies: not because it proves the extraordinary, but because it preserves the full tension between credible witnesses, confusing night-sky perception, official ambiguity, media simplification, and the stubborn absence of a final answer.

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

Books and field guides related to Inside the 2000 St. Clair Triangle UFO Event. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.

Book

The UFO Experience

By Joseph Allen Hynek

Useful for analysing witness-driven sightings.

See on Amazon

Book

Dimensions

By Jacques Vallee

Examines recurring patterns in unusual sightings.

See on Amazon

Book

UFOs

By Leslie Kean

Provides broader context for credible multi-witness UFO reports.

See on Amazon

Book

Triangular UFOs

By David Marler

Directly matches the St. Clair Triangle event theme.

See on Amazon

Browse more on Amazon: The UFO Experience Dimensions UFOs

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

eBay marketplace picks

Marketplace Samples

Example marketplace items related to this page. Use the search link to explore similar finds on eBay.

Shop location

Using USA USA USAUK

Example eBay listing

Fantastic Universe: UFOs in New York Poster Print

Search eBay.com: ufos poster

Browse similar on eBay.com

Example eBay listing

Ufos Are Real Movie Poster 24in x 36in

Search eBay.com: ufos poster

Browse similar on eBay.com

Example eBay listing

UFOs EXIST Flying Saucer X-Files Conspiracy Poster/Print signed by artist Frank

Search eBay.com: ufos poster

Browse similar on eBay.com

Example eBay listing

Giant UFOs Over Futuristic Sci Fi City Poster 18x24in

Search eBay.com: ufos poster

Browse similar on eBay.com

Browse more on eBay.com

Example items shown for inspiration; availability and pricing can change. Branchoria may earn a commission if you purchase through outbound eBay links.

Example eBay listing

Ufos In Ancient Art. The Annunciati Framed Wall Art Poster Canvas Print Picture

Search eBay.co.uk: ufos poster

Browse similar on eBay.co.uk

Example eBay listing

Ufos In Ancient Art. The Annunciati Framed Wall Art Poster Canvas Print Picture

Search eBay.co.uk: ufos poster

Browse similar on eBay.co.uk

Example eBay listing

TRIPPY UFOS SOLDIER POSTER PRINT IMAGE PSYCHEDELIC BRIGHT ART SIZE A3 A4 SIZE

Search eBay.co.uk: ufos poster

Browse similar on eBay.co.uk

Example eBay listing

Ufos on the sky Art Print Framed Wall Art Poster Canvas Print Picture

Search eBay.co.uk: ufos poster

Browse similar on eBay.co.uk

Browse more on eBay.co.uk

Example items shown for inspiration; availability and pricing can change. Branchoria may earn a commission if you purchase through outbound eBay links.

Endnotes

1. Source: cufos.org
   Title: Center for UFO Studies
   Link: https://cufos.org/PDFs/cases/IllinoisTriangle.pdf

2. Source: files.secure.website
   Title: Web Starts Triangular UFOs: An Estimate of the Situation
   Link: https://files.secure.website/wscfus/10582237/26186165/triangular-ufos-an-estimate-of-the-situation-by-david-marler-john-b-alexander-richard-m-dolan-mark-rodeghier-sam-maranto-george-wingfield-omar-fowler-team-enki-free-pdf.pdf

3. Source: scott.af.mil
   Title: About Us
   Link: https://www.scott.af.mil/About-Us/

4. Source: ecfr.gov
   Link: https://www.ecfr.gov/current/title-14/chapter-I/subchapter-C/part-25/subpart-F/subject-group-ECFR0cb7970b9d1fd5f
   Source snippet

   eCFR:: 14 CFR Part 25 Subpart F - Lights (FAR Part 25 Subpart F - ECFR0cb7970b9d1fd5f)...

5. Source: skeptoid.com
   Link: https://skeptoid.com/episodes/435

6. Source: scott.af.mil
   Title: 375 AMW & Scott AFB History Pamphlet CAO 1 Feb 2024 FINAL
   Link: https://www.scott.af.mil/Portals/28/Page%20documents/History/375%20AMW%20%26%20Scott%20AFB%20History%20Pamphlet%20CAO%201%20Feb%202024%20FINAL.pdf

7. Source: mufon.com
   Title: Mufon April 2023 Journal
   Link: https://mufon.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Mufon-April-2023-Journal.pdf
   Published: April 2023

8. Source: history.com
   Title: black triangle ufos facts
   Link: https://www.history.com/articles/black-triangle-ufos-facts

9. Source: dnrhistoric.illinois.gov
   Title: scott afb architectural inventory
   Link: https://dnrhistoric.illinois.gov/content/dam/soi/en/web/dnrhistoric/preserve/recordation/scott-afb-architectural-inventory.pdf

10. Source: thedebrief.org
    Title: the st clair triangle ufo incident of 2000 a fresh look
    Link: https://thedebrief.org/the-st-clair-triangle-ufo-incident-of-2000-a-fresh-look/

11. Source: snap.berkeley.edu
    Link: https://snap.berkeley.edu/project/11166188

12. Source: vetfriends.com
    Link: https://www.vetfriends.com/branches/air-force/units/375th-air-mobility-wing

Additional References

1. Source: youtube.com
   Title: 25 Mysteries That Are Still Unsolved 25 Years Later
   Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lnTz8fJ8Edc
   Source snippet

   The Police Confirmed UFO Sighting video provides a detailed breakdown of the January 2000 incident using first-hand testimony from the re...

   Published: January 2000

2. Source: youtube.com
   Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YhSLMzX3Mnw
   Source snippet

   25 Mysteries That Are Still Unsolved 25 Years Later...

3. Source: youtube.com
   Title: The UFO Encounter That Left Witnesses Paralyzed with Fear
   Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=F0EEbxfIgwQ
   Source snippet

   TRIANGULAR UFO Breakdown by Author David Marler + His HISTORY'S UNIDENTIFIED Appearance...

4. Source: youtube.com
   Title: Did Illinois Police Officers Really Chase Down A UFO? | Unsolved Mysteries
   Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ixqNeQum-Iw
   Source snippet

   The UFO Encounter That Left Witnesses Paralyzed with Fear...

5. Source: youtube.com
   Title: Police Confirmed UFO Sighting | National Geographic
   Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tsyD3_KHwCY
   Source snippet

   Did Illinois Police Officers Really Chase Down A UFO? | Unsolved Mysteries...

6. Source: huggingface.co
   Link: https://huggingface.co/microsoft/cocolm-base/resolve/main/dict.txt?download=true

7. Source: facebook.com
   Link: https://www.facebook.com/asthmatickitty/posts/a-ufo-sighting-near-highland-illinois-occurred-in-the-early-morning-of-january-5/1458036326327075/

8. Source: reddit.com
   Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/coolguides/comments/16pu5xe/a_cool_guide_to_why_do_airplanes_have_red_and/

9. Source: airandspaceforces.com
   Link: https://www.airandspaceforces.com/app/uploads/2023/07/Almanac2023_Wings_V2.pdf

10. Source: amcmuseum.org
    Link: https://www.amcmuseum.org/history/air-mobility-command-museums-control-tower-a-historical-overview/