Within Hawaii UFOs
What Official Files Can and Cannot Prove
Project Blue Book gives Hawaii sightings a national frame, but official 'unidentified' never meant confirmed alien craft.
On this page
- How Project Blue Book handled UFO reports
- What 'unidentified' meant in official records
- Why post 1969 Hawaii cases need other sources
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
Project Blue Book gives Hawaii’s older UFO record an official paper trail, but it does not give it a simple verdict. The useful answer is that Hawaii appears in the same national Air Force archive as better-known mainland cases, yet a Blue Book label such as “unidentified” meant only that investigators had not reached a conventional explanation from the available evidence. It did not mean alien craft, secret technology, or proof of a threat. The US Air Force recorded 12,618 UFO reports between 1947 and 1969; 701 were left unidentified, while the programme’s formal conclusions said no investigated UFO had shown evidence of a national-security threat, advanced unknown technology, or extraterrestrial vehicles. [National Archives]nationalarchives.gov.ukSource details in endnotes.
For Hawaii, the value of Project Blue Book is therefore not that it “solves” the islands’ UFO history. Its value is narrower and more practical: it shows how official investigators logged, categorised and sometimes explained reports from a Pacific state shaped by military aviation, ocean horizons and long over-water flight paths. It also marks a hard boundary. Blue Book closed in 1969, so later Hawaii cases, including modern phone-video sightings over Oahu, have to be assessed through other records such as FAA statements, police-linked reports, local journalism, FOIA releases, sceptical analysis and newer UAP archives. [National Archives]nationalarchives.gov.ukSource details in endnotes.
How Blue Book turned Hawaii sightings into records
Project Blue Book was the Air Force’s longest-running public UFO investigation, operating from March 1952 until its termination in December 1969 after earlier Air Force projects called Sign and Grudge. The National Archives describes the Blue Book files as case records for specific sightings or closely related groups of sightings, usually containing observer reports, correspondence, clippings, analysis of photographs or physical evidence, and a control sheet summarising the Air Force’s conclusion. [National Archives]nationalarchives.gov.ukSource details in endnotes.
That record-keeping matters for Hawaii because the state’s UFO stories often circulate as anecdotes: a light seen over the sea, something apparently dropping into water, a pilot account over the Pacific, or a coastal witness report with few fixed reference points. A Blue Book file, when it exists, gives a reader a stronger starting point: date, place, witness type, observation method, duration, source and official classification. It still may not be enough to prove what was seen, but it usually improves the question from “Did this story happen?” to “What did the report actually say, and what did investigators do with it?”
The National Archives says Blue Book textual records include roughly 37 cubic feet of chronological case files, additional administrative and Office of Special Investigations material, and finding aids indexed by date and location. Access historically used 94 rolls of 35 mm microfilm, with photographs filmed separately on the final rolls; Fold3’s online collection describes the same NARA T1206 record set and lists 129,658 records. [National Archives]nationalarchives.gov.ukSource details in endnotes. [Fold3]fold3.comUS, Project Blue BookUS, Project Blue Book
For Hawaii researchers, this means the “official trail” is not one tidy Hawaii dossier. It is a set of scattered records inside a national archive. A local news review of the digitised Blue Book material in 2015 reported that searching “Hawaiʻi” in the online collection produced 40 documents, with locations including Hilo, Honolulu, Kauaʻi, Hickam Air Force Base, Waikīkī Beach, ʻEwa Beach, Pearl Harbor, Haleʻiwa, Barbers Point and Kunia. That count should be treated as a search-result snapshot rather than a final census, but it shows that Hawaii’s official UFO trail is real, searchable and geographically varied. [Maui Now]mauinow.com1956 maui ufo sighting documented in air force files1956 maui ufo sighting documented in air force files
A Maui file shows the method and its limits
One of the clearest Hawaii examples is the January 1956 Lahaina, Maui case. The Blue Book Archive entry identifies it as a five-page Project Blue Book document for “LaHinia, Maui, Hawaii”, case number 7340318. The first-page record card gives the date as 20 January 1956, the observation type as ground-visual, the source as civilian, the length of observation as 25 minutes, and the number of objects as one. Its conclusion was not “unidentified”: the card marks the case as probably aircraft. [Project Blue Book Archive]bluebookfiles.orgSource details in endnotes.
The report’s short description is vivid enough to show why the witness found it strange. The object was described as roughly “quarter colour orange”, with a flame and a muffled roar, coming fast, slowing, hovering, fading out in the distance, and seen during a period when the witness reported several similar observations in January 1952 and January 1956. The control-card comment was more prosaic: “A/C light. Believed to be cause by investigating officials,” meaning the official assessment leaned towards aircraft lights rather than an unknown craft. [Bluebook Files]files.bluebookfiles.orgBluebook Files
Local reporting from Maui Now adds more detail from the Air Intelligence Information Report. The witness was described as a 56-year-old retired Lahaina woman who saw an orange object at night; the account says she watched it through a screen window for about 25 minutes as it moved towards Molokaʻi, around ten miles across the channel. Investigators argued that the colour, size and flight path left little doubt that the object was aircraft, and that diffusion and refraction of lights in dense low atmosphere could explain the witness’s estimate of size and colour. [Maui Now]mauinow.com1956 maui ufo sighting documented in air force files1956 maui ufo sighting documented in air force files
This case is useful because it is not spectacular. It shows the everyday machinery of Blue Book: a witness report enters the system, is reduced to fields on a record card, and receives a conventional explanation. For a Hawaii UFO history, that is just as important as an “unknown” case. It demonstrates that a dramatic local description could be officially interpreted as aircraft lighting distorted by atmosphere, distance and observation conditions — exactly the kinds of issues that recur in island sightings over dark water and low horizons.
It also shows why Blue Book files should be read carefully rather than reverently. The file preserves the witness’s experience, but the official conclusion depends on judgement. The Maui explanation may be plausible, especially given the aircraft-light assessment and atmospheric reasoning, but the surviving public record does not turn the witness’s 25-minute observation into a fully reconstructed flight path. It is best treated as an officially explained case, not as proof that nothing unusual was seen and not as evidence of an extraordinary craft.
What “unidentified” meant in official records
The word “unidentified” is the most commonly misunderstood part of Blue Book. In ordinary conversation it can sound like a dramatic finding. In the Air Force system it was a category of unresolved investigation. AARO’s 2024 historical report summarises Blue Book’s categories as identified, insufficient data and unidentified. Identified cases could include astronomical objects, balloons, aircraft, afterburners, satellites, missiles, reflections, searchlights, birds, kites, false radar returns, fireworks, flares and hoaxes. [U.S. Department of War]media.defense.govU.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1U.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1(#endnote-5 “Endnote 5”)
That framework is especially relevant to Hawaii. Many recurring Hawaii UFO descriptions — bright lights over water, orange or blue glows, objects apparently descending into the sea, lights on the horizon, or fast-moving objects with little scale reference — overlap with categories Blue Book already treated as common sources of confusion. Aircraft at distance, bright planets through haze, balloons, flares, missile or satellite activity, and reflections can all look stranger when seen against an ocean horizon.
But the opposite mistake is also worth avoiding. “Common sources of confusion” does not mean every report is explained. Blue Book’s own final tally left 701 cases unidentified, and AARO’s later review repeated that those 701 were never solved within the Blue Book holdings. The important distinction is that “unidentified” records an investigative residue. It says the case was not resolved from the available information; it does not identify the cause. [Air Force]af.milUnidentified Flying Objects and Air Force Project Blue Book > Air Force > Fact Sheet Display… [U.S. Department of War]media.defense.govU.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1U.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1(#endnote-5 “Endnote 5”)
The Air Force’s public fact sheet drew the line sharply. It stated that no investigated and evaluated UFO had indicated a national-security threat, no evidence showed technology beyond modern scientific knowledge, and no evidence showed that unidentified sightings were extraterrestrial vehicles. Those are institutional conclusions, not independent proof that every witness was mistaken; still, they are the official context in which Hawaii Blue Book entries have to be read. [Air Force]af.milUnidentified Flying Objects and Air Force Project Blue Book > Air Force > Fact Sheet Display…
For readers following Hawaii’s UFO history, the best practical rule is this: an official “unidentified” label can make a case worth studying, but it cannot carry the whole argument. The strength of any Hawaii case still depends on the details: named or trained witnesses, precise time and location, radar or sensor corroboration, photographs or film, weather and astronomical checks, aircraft activity, chain of custody for documents, and whether later analysis has added or weakened the original claim.
Why the archive is not a complete Hawaii UFO map
Project Blue Book was a federal Air Force programme, not a neutral all-sky monitoring system. Its files reflect what was reported, accepted, preserved, indexed and later released with privacy protections. The National Archives notes that Blue Book records excluded names of people involved in sightings in the research copies and that personally identifiable information had to be redacted before the collection became available for public research in 1976. [National Archives]nationalarchives.gov.ukSource details in endnotes. [National Archives]nationalarchives.gov.ukSource details in endnotes.
That matters because Hawaii’s UFO trail includes more than Blue Book. Some reports may have gone to police, local media, naval or aviation channels, private UFO organisations, or nowhere at all. Others may have been handled as aircraft, missile, range-safety, meteorological or intelligence matters rather than as public UFO cases. Blue Book is therefore a major source for the official record, but it is not a full inventory of everything unusual that residents, pilots or military personnel may have reported in or near Hawaii.
The archive also has a built-in date limit. The National Archives is explicit: Project Blue Book closed in 1969 and has no information on sightings after that date. This is a crucial boundary for Hawaii because many of the state’s most visible public UFO discussions are modern: phone videos, FAA queries, social-media amplification and renewed UAP interest after the US government’s post-2017 transparency shift. [National Archives]nationalarchives.gov.ukSource details in endnotes.
There is now a separate modern archival mechanism. NARA established Record Group 615, the Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Records Collection, under the 2024 National Defense Authorization Act, and says it will add UAP records on a rolling basis as federal agencies transfer them. That does not retroactively turn post-1969 Hawaii sightings into Blue Book cases, but it does mean the official paper trail after Blue Book is becoming a different kind of archive. [National Archives]nationalarchives.gov.ukSource details in endnotes.
The result is a two-layered research problem. For Hawaii cases from 1947 to 1969, Blue Book and related Air Force records are the first official stop. For later Hawaii cases, the better path runs through FAA records, police logs, Coast Guard or military communications where available, local reporting, FOIA releases, astronomical and satellite checks, launch schedules, and sceptical reconstruction.
Post-1969 Hawaii cases need different evidence
The 29 December 2020 Oahu “blue object” case shows why post-Blue Book Hawaii sightings cannot be forced into the old framework. Hawaii News Now reported that witnesses on Leeward Oahu called 911 after seeing a glowing oblong blue object, with some saying it appeared to fall into the ocean. The FAA said there were no aircraft incidents or accidents in the area at the time. https [www.hawaiinewsnow.com]hawaiinewsnow.comSource details in endnotes.
That sounds, on the surface, like the kind of report Blue Book might once have logged. But the available evidence is modern: phone videos, television reporting, police-to-FAA contact and later FOIA-based reporting. Vice reported in 2021 that a FOIA release showed air traffic controllers had no record of missing or damaged aircraft, and that military search-and-rescue personnel asked about the caller after a possible downed-aircraft report from Nanakuli. [VICE]vice.comThe Pentagon Was Interested in Hawaiian UFO Sighting, Documents RevealThe Pentagon Was Interested in Hawaiian UFO Sighting, Documents Reveal
The same case also shows why “official interest” is not the same as confirmation. A search-and-rescue query after a possible downed aircraft is exactly what one would expect if witnesses reported something falling offshore. It confirms that authorities took a safety-related report seriously; it does not establish that the object was exotic. A sceptical reconstruction in Skeptical Inquirer argued that the videos were consistent with a lighted object such as balloons, possibly appearing to move because of camera shake, distance and poor reference points, and later floating gently on the water rather than crashing. [Skeptical Inquirer]skepticalinquirer.orgSkeptical Inquirer Hawaiian ‘UFO’ Sighting | Skeptical InquirerSkeptical Inquirer Hawaiian ‘UFO’ Sighting | Skeptical Inquirer
The Oahu case is outside Blue Book’s date range, but it is highly relevant to interpreting Hawaii’s official UFO trail. It shows the continuity of the basic problem: witnesses can report something genuinely puzzling, official systems may find no aircraft incident, media attention may amplify the mystery, and later analysis may propose a mundane explanation without being able to prove every detail. That is the same tension Blue Book files repeatedly reveal, but in a modern evidence environment.
What official files can prove — and what they cannot
Official files can prove that a report existed, that it entered a government process, and that investigators reached a stated conclusion or left the case unresolved. They can also show whether the report involved a civilian, pilot, radar track, photograph, aircraft incident, police notification or military facility. In Hawaii, that is valuable because it separates archival cases from folklore and helps connect sightings to places such as Lahaina, Honolulu, Hickam, Pearl Harbor, Barbers Point or the waters between islands.
Official files cannot prove that a witness’s interpretation was correct. They also cannot prove that an official explanation was perfect. The 1956 Lahaina file, for example, establishes that a woman reported an orange, flame-like object and that investigators concluded it was probably aircraft; it does not allow a modern reader to replay the sky over West Maui with complete certainty. [Project Blue Book Archive]bluebookfiles.orgSource details in endnotes. [Maui Now]mauinow.com1956 maui ufo sighting documented in air force files1956 maui ufo sighting documented in air force files
The strongest reading is therefore neither credulous nor dismissive. Blue Book records are evidence of official handling, not automatic evidence of extraordinary objects. A case becomes stronger when the official file contains multiple independent witnesses, trained observers, radar or instrument data, physical evidence with clear custody, or careful elimination of known causes. It becomes weaker when it depends on a single visual report, imprecise location, poor viewing conditions, missing documentation, or a plausible conventional explanation.
For Hawaii, the geography makes this even more important. Ocean horizons, night-time coastal viewing, atmospheric distortion, aircraft over water, military aviation, balloons, satellites, launches and distant lights can all produce reports that feel dramatic to sincere witnesses. Blue Book’s value is that it preserves how such reports were filtered through a Cold War bureaucracy. Its weakness is that bureaucracy was not designed to answer every scientific question a modern reader might ask.
The Hawaii takeaway
Project Blue Book gives Hawaii’s UFO history a documented federal backbone, but not a sensational conclusion. The official record shows that Hawaii reports were part of the national Air Force UFO system, that at least some local cases were investigated and conventionally classified, and that the broader programme left a small but real residue of unresolved reports. It also shows that “unidentified” was an evidentiary category, not a synonym for alien spacecraft. [Air Force]af.milUnidentified Flying Objects and Air Force Project Blue Book > Air Force > Fact Sheet Display…
The most useful way to read Hawaii’s Blue Book trail is as a sorting tool. Cases such as the 1956 Lahaina report show how a strange island sighting could be reduced to an aircraft-light explanation. Broader National Archives and Fold3 holdings show where researchers can look for official records across the 1947–1969 period. Post-1969 cases, including the 2020 Oahu blue-object incident, require a different evidential route through FAA records, local reporting, FOIA material and modern UAP archives rather than Project Blue Book itself. [Fold3]fold3.comOpen source on fold3.com. https [www.hawaiinewsnow.com]hawaiinewsnow.comSource details in endnotes.
That makes Hawaii’s official UFO trail less like a closed mystery and more like a disciplined reading exercise. The files can confirm that reports were made, preserve details that might otherwise be lost, and show what official investigators believed at the time. They cannot, by themselves, settle every sighting, rescue every weak anecdote, or turn an unresolved case into proof of something extraordinary.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to What Official Files Can and Cannot Prove. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects
Directly explains how official UFO investigations worked and what unresolved cases meant.
UFOs
Examines credible reports and government documentation rather than sensational claims.
The UFO Experience
Written by a key scientific consultant to Air Force UFO investigations.
Watch the Skies!
Places Blue Book and official UFO investigations within a broader historical framework.
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Example marketplace items related to this page. Use the search link to explore similar finds on eBay.
Endnotes
-
Source: archives.gov
Title: National Archives Project BLUE BOOK
Link: https://www.archives.gov/research/military/air-force/ufos -
Source: archives.gov
Link: https://www.archives.gov/news/articles/project-blue-book-50th-anniversary -
Source: fold3.com
Title: US, Project Blue Book
Link: https://www.fold3.com/publication/461/us-project-blue-book-ufo-investigations-1947-1969 -
Source: files.bluebookfiles.org
Title: Bluebook Files
Link: https://files.bluebookfiles.org/thumbs/4524.webp -
Source: media.defense.gov
Title: U.S. Department of War AARO Historical Record Report Volume 1
Link: https://media.defense.gov/2024/Mar/08/2003409233/-1/-1/0/DOPSR-2024-0263-AARO-HISTORICAL-RECORD-REPORT-VOLUME-1-2024.PDF -
Source: af.mil
Title: Air Force
Link: https://www.af.mil/About-Us/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/104590/unidentified-flying-objects-and-air-force-project-blue-book/Source snippet
Unidentified Flying Objects and Air Force Project Blue Book > Air Force > Fact Sheet Display...
-
Source: archives.gov
Link: https://www.archives.gov/research/topics/uaps -
Source: hawaiinewsnow.com
Link: https://www.hawaiinewsnow.com/2020/12/31/faa-notified-after-mysterious-ufo-seen-above-oahu-appeared-drop-into-ocean/ -
Source: vice.com
Title: The Pentagon Was Interested in Hawaiian UFO Sighting, Documents Reveal
Link: https://www.vice.com/en/article/the-pentagon-was-interested-in-hawaiian-ufo-sighting-documents-reveal/ -
Source: archives.gov
Title: nara documents2
Link: https://www.archives.gov/research/foreign-policy/cold-war/1961-berlin-crisis/nara-documents2 -
Source: unwritten-record.blogs.archives.gov
Link: https://unwritten-record.blogs.archives.gov/2014/07/ -
Source: archives.gov
Title: moving images and sound
Link: https://www.archives.gov/research/topics/uaps/moving-images-and-sound -
Source: archives.gov
Link: https://www.archives.gov/research/topics/uaps/photographs -
Source: unwritten-record.blogs.archives.gov
Title: project blue book
Link: https://unwritten-record.blogs.archives.gov/tag/project-blue-book/ -
Source: archives.gov
Title: uap bulk download
Link: https://www.archives.gov/research/catalog/catalog-bulk-downloads/uap-bulk-download -
Source: archives.gov
Title: do records show proof of ufos
Link: https://www.archives.gov/news/articles/do-records-show-proof-of-ufos -
Source: prologue.blogs.archives.gov
Title: ufos natural explanations
Link: https://prologue.blogs.archives.gov/2018/04/16/ufos-natural-explanations/ -
Source: archives.gov
Title: rg collections
Link: https://www.archives.gov/research/topics/uaps/rg-collections -
Source: prologue.blogs.archives.gov
Title: invasion of privacy
Link: https://prologue.blogs.archives.gov/2018/04/09/invasion-of-privacy/ -
Source: unwritten-record.blogs.archives.gov
Title: project blue book ufos in home movies
Link: https://unwritten-record.blogs.archives.gov/2013/10/28/project-blue-book-ufos-in-home-movies/ -
Source: archives.gov
Title: textual and microfilm
Link: https://www.archives.gov/research/topics/uaps/textual-and-microfilm -
Source: prologue.blogs.archives.gov
Title: ufos man made made up and unknown
Link: https://prologue.blogs.archives.gov/2018/04/23/ufos-man-made-made-up-and-unknown/ -
Source: archives.gov
Title: Project BLUE BOOK
Link: https://www.archives.gov/foia/ufos.html -
Source: visit.archives.gov
Link: https://visit.archives.gov/search?f%5B0%5D=exhibit_type%3APast&page=1&search_api_fulltext= -
Source: prologue.blogs.archives.gov
Title: saucers over washington the history of project blue book
Link: https://prologue.blogs.archives.gov/2019/12/19/saucers-over-washington-the-history-of-project-blue-book/ -
Source: fold3.com
Link: https://www.fold3.com/pdf/T1206.pdf -
Source: blog.fold3.com
Link: https://blog.fold3.com/author/laura/page/3/ -
Source: fold3.com
Title: in US, Project Blue Book
Link: https://www.fold3.com/document/6969808 -
Source: fold3.com
Title: in US, Project Blue Book
Link: https://www.fold3.com/document/6965932/kettering-ohio-blank-page-1-us-project-blue-book-ufo-investigations-1947-1969 -
Source: fold3.com
Link: https://www.fold3.com/document/7455915/south-hill-virginia-blank-page-62-us-project-blue-book-ufo-investigations-1947-1969 -
Source: fold3.com
Title: in US, Project Blue Book
Link: https://www.fold3.com/document/6979613/ramey-afb-puerto-rico-11683-page-2-us-project-blue-book-ufo-investigations-1947-1969 -
Source: blog.fold3.com
Link: https://blog.fold3.com/10-million-original-documents-and-growing-daily/ -
Source: blog.fold3.com
Title: august 1963 ufo reports in project blue book
Link: https://blog.fold3.com/august-1963-ufo-reports-in-project-blue-book/
Published: august 1963 -
Source: fold3.com
Title: socorro new mexico 8766 page 1 us project blue book ufo investigations 1947 1969
Link: https://www.fold3.com/document/6977589/socorro-new-mexico-8766-page-1-us-project-blue-book-ufo-investigations-1947-1969 -
Source: fold3.com
Title: in US, Project Blue Book
Link: https://www.fold3.com/document/9613416/bet-pope-afb-and-bolling-fld-blank-page-1-us-project-blue-book-ufo-investigations-1947-1969 -
Source: fold3.com
Title: U S, Census
Link: https://www.fold3.com/publication/20/us-census-federal-1930 -
Source: archive.org
Link: https://archive.org/stream/pdfy-4vyHjooOJagoGAwN/Scientific%2BStudy%2BOf%2BUnidentified%2BFlying%2BObjects_djvu.txt -
Source: home.ifa.hawaii.edu
Title: Ast281 UFO
Link: https://home.ifa.hawaii.edu/users/meech/a281/handouts/Ast281_UFO.pdf -
Source: faa.gov
Title: general statements
Link: https://www.faa.gov/newsroom/statements/general-statements -
Source: mauinow.com
Title: 1956 maui ufo sighting documented in air force files
Link: https://mauinow.com/2015/02/11/1956-maui-ufo-sighting-documented-in-air-force-files/ -
Source: bluebookfiles.org
Link: https://bluebookfiles.org/doc/4524 -
Source: skepticalinquirer.org
Title: Skeptical Inquirer Hawaiian ‘UFO’ Sighting | Skeptical Inquirer
Link: https://skepticalinquirer.org/exclusive/hawaiian-ufo-sighting/ -
Source: airforcetimes.com
Title: project blue book the air forces covert ufo investigation is brought to tv
Link: https://www.airforcetimes.com/news/your-air-force/2019/01/10/project-blue-book-the-air-forces-covert-ufo-investigation-is-brought-to-tv/ -
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Project Blue Book
Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Blue_Book -
Source: nationalarchives.gov.uk
Link: https://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/help-with-your-research/research-guides/ufos/ -
Source: cdn.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Link: https://cdn.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/aug-2011-research-guide.pdf -
Source: documents.theblackvault.com
Title: FOIALog FY02
Link: https://documents.theblackvault.com/documents/foia/FOIALog_FY02.pdf -
Source: britannica.com
Title: Project Blue Book
Link: https://www.britannica.com/topic/Project-Blue-Book
Additional References
-
Source: youtube.com
Title: The True Story Behind US Government Investigations Into UFOs | Project Blue Book
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qdTVsr4O4HASource snippet
Project Blue Book: America's Obsession with UFOs...
-
Source: youtube.com
Title: Interstellar Object Discovered in Maui Baffles Experts
Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LWYo7lnRdlASource snippet
The True Story Behind US Government Investigations Into UFOs | Project Blue Book...
-
Source: nsa.gov
Link: https://www.nsa.gov/portals/75/documents/news-features/declassified-documents/ufo/usaf_fact_sheet_95_03.pdf -
Source: facebook.com
Link: https://www.facebook.com/groups/THEUFOFILESGROUP/posts/2382409622196677/ -
Source: reddit.com
Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1lixfba/a_new_research_document_written_by_geoff/ -
Source: facebook.com
Link: https://www.facebook.com/usnationalarchives/posts/after-investigating-a-possible-ufo-sighting-theunited-states-air-force-would-pla/10156582716052994/ -
Source: x.com
Link: https://x.com/ABC7NY/status/1346207315926503424?lang=en -
Source: facebook.com
Link: https://www.facebook.com/WIONews/posts/declassified-documents-raise-intrigueus-air-force-document-cites-12618-ufo-sight/1335121142060390/ -
Source: facebook.com
Link: https://www.facebook.com/HISTORY/posts/during-the-cold-war-as-project-blue-book-investigated-potential-ufo-threats-a-sh/1473622884330683/ -
Source: facebook.com
Link: https://www.facebook.com/engineeringexploration/posts/the-historical-intersection-of-global-tension-and-unidentified-aerial-phenomena-/1019390780634503/
Topic Tree