Branchoria UAP State Files UAP State Files

State-by-state UFO cases, records, explanations, and evidence checks.

Within Georgia UFOs

How Reliable Are Georgia's UFO Records and Databases?

Modern databases and newspaper archives preserve Georgia sightings, but most reports remain incomplete and hard to verify.

On this page

  • NUFORC and archive collections
  • What makes a strong UFO report
  • Why many cases stay unidentified
Preview for How Reliable Are Georgia's UFO Records and Databases?

Introduction

Georgia’s UFO record is useful, but it is not a clean catalogue of proven mysteries. Most reports survive as civilian database entries, newspaper stories, digitised federal files, local memories, and a few prominent archived documents such as Jimmy Carter’s Leary report. That means the state’s UFO history is best read as a record of claims, witnesses, patterns, and reporting behaviour rather than as a list of confirmed anomalous craft. NUFORC, Enigma Labs, older Project Blue Book files, local journalism, and scattered MUFON-linked follow-ups can all preserve leads, but they vary sharply in detail, verification and independence. The strongest Georgia reports tend to have prompt reporting, multiple independent witnesses, clear time and location data, aviation or radar context, and a serious attempt to rule out aircraft, planets, drones, satellites, balloons, meteors, flares, and hoaxes. The weakest reports are often sincere but too late, too vague, or too dependent on memory to resolve.

Overview image for Records

Where Georgia UFO records actually live

Georgia does not have one official state UFO archive. Instead, its sightings are scattered across several kinds of record, each with a different purpose and a different reliability problem. Civilian databases collect public reports at scale; newspaper archives preserve what local communities were told at the time; federal collections preserve older official investigations; and modern apps try to turn witness accounts into more structured data.

The National UFO Reporting Center, usually shortened to NUFORC, is the most visible public database for Georgia reports. Its Georgia index lists sightings by date, city, shape, summary and report date, with entries ranging from historic claims to very recent reports, including 2026 items from places such as Chickamauga and Statesboro. That breadth is useful for spotting clusters and recurring report types, but it also means the index mixes fresh accounts, delayed memories, single-witness stories, and reports with very different levels of detail. [NUFORC]nuforc.orgOpen source on nuforc.org.

Enigma Labs offers another modern public-facing layer. Its Georgia page presents mapped UFO and UAP sightings, distinguishes Enigma-submitted sightings from third-party sightings, and markets itself as a mobile reporting and alert platform. Its wider site says it combines more than 270,000 historical reports from public sources with its own structured reporting tools, which makes it valuable for navigation but not automatically authoritative for case resolution. [Enigma Labs]enigmalabs.ioSource details in endnotes. Report a UFO sighting

Federal records matter mainly for older cases. The National Archives explains that the US Air Force’s Project Blue Book UFO files were declassified and transferred to archival custody, but also notes that Project Blue Book closed in 1969 and does not cover later sightings. That limitation is crucial for Georgia: Blue Book can help with mid-century cases, but it does not explain the 1973 Georgia flap, Carter’s later-filed report, or modern Atlanta-area entries. [National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational Archives Project BLUE BOOK

Local journalism fills some of that gap. Macon-area reporting has preserved details of the 1973 wave, including accounts of police, firefighters and other residents seeing unusual lights across Middle Georgia. Newspaper pieces are not scientific investigations, but they can show when a claim entered public circulation, whether officials were named, and whether multiple communities reported similar events within the same narrow period. [Macon Telegraph]macon.comSource details in endnotes.

Records illustration 1

NUFORC and archive collections: useful, but not verdicts

NUFORC’s value is that it keeps reports accessible. A researcher can move from a statewide Georgia index to individual entries and compare dates, shapes, locations, observer counts and summaries. For example, one NUFORC-listed Georgia case from Chatsworth/Fort Mountain describes a 1998 sighting by one law-enforcement observer and includes a “MUFON/GEORGIA FOLLOW-UP REPORT” note; another, from Atlanta in 2023, identifies the witnesses as pilots and describes a burst of light during take-off from Hartsfield-Jackson Atlanta International Airport. Those details make the reports more useful than a bare rumour, because they provide witness type, place, time and context. [NUFORC]nuforc.orgOpen source on nuforc.org.

That still does not make the reports solved or verified. A NUFORC entry is usually a submitted report, not a completed investigation. Some entries include unusually helpful notes, while others are brief, emotional, ambiguous or filed many years after the claimed event. The Georgia index itself shows this problem: entries may describe precise dates, approximate dates, long reporting delays, single witnesses, multiple witnesses, or only very general locations. [NUFORC]nuforc.orgOpen source on nuforc.org.

Newspaper archives have a different strength. They capture public reaction close to the time of a local wave. The 1973 South Georgia reports, for instance, were described as coming from police in Albany, Dawson, Cordele and Adel, with other reports from Macon, Leary and nearby communities. That kind of contemporaneous clustering is harder to dismiss than a lone memory posted decades later, but it still leaves open the central question: were witnesses seeing one unusual phenomenon, several ordinary phenomena in a charged news environment, or a mixture of both? [Newspapers]newspapers.comtallahassee democrat south georgia ufo 1tallahassee democrat south georgia ufo 1

The Carter file shows why archives can be both strong and frustrating. The National Archives notes that Carter filed a report about seeing a UFO over Leary, Georgia, and that the Jimmy Carter Presidential Museum and Library holds the report he submitted to the International UFO Bureau. The document is historically important because it ties a Georgia sighting to a named, prominent witness and a preserved written record. Yet the case remains disputed because the report was filed years after the event, the exact date has been debated, and later explanations have ranged from Venus to a high-altitude barium cloud experiment. [National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational Archives Project BLUE BOOK [The Black]documents.theblackvault.comCarter UFOCarter UFO

What makes a strong Georgia UFO report?

A strong UFO report is not simply one told by a respectable person. Credibility helps, but reliability depends on the structure of the evidence. A police officer, pilot or public official may be a careful observer in many situations and still misjudge distance, speed, altitude, brightness or direction when looking at a light in the night sky. Georgia’s records are full of lights, orbs, triangles, fireballs and “unknown” shapes, and many of those categories overlap with ordinary aircraft, satellites, meteors, drones, balloons, flares and bright planets.

A stronger Georgia report usually has several features working together:

  • Prompt reporting: the closer the report is to the event, the less it depends on reshaped memory.
  • Exact time and location: a clear date, time, direction, elevation and viewing position allow comparison with aircraft tracks, satellites, astronomical objects and weather.
  • Multiple independent witnesses: separate reports from people in different places are more useful than a group repeating one shared impression.
  • Observable behaviour, not just labels: “moved north-east, stopped, changed brightness, lasted three minutes” is more useful than “alien craft”.
  • Instrumental or official context: radar, air-traffic information, police logs, pilot reports, photographs with metadata, or synchronised video can change a case from anecdote into something testable.
  • Active exclusion of common causes: a report gains strength when investigators check aircraft, drones, Starlink-like satellite trains, planets, meteors, balloons, sky lanterns, military activity and weather before calling it unexplained.

NASA’s UAP independent study team made a similar point at national level: eyewitness reports can reveal patterns, including clusters in time or location, but without calibrated sensor data they cannot by themselves provide conclusive evidence about what an object was. That standard applies directly to Georgia’s databases. A cluster near Atlanta, Macon, Savannah or a military aviation corridor may be worth investigating, but a cluster is not proof of anything exotic unless the individual records are strong enough to test. [NASA Science]science.nasa.govScience Independent Study Team ReportScience Independent Study Team Report

AARO, the US All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, also stresses a data-driven approach. Its public material lists ordinary sources commonly reported as UAP, including airborne clutter, and later Defence Department coverage says AARO has resolved many cases as balloons, birds, drones, satellites and aircraft. That does not mean every Georgia report is mundane; it means mundane explanations must be checked before an “unidentified” label carries much weight. [AARO]aaro.milOpen source on aaro.mil.

All the videos from Pentagon's first batch of UFO files

Channel: Face the Nation · Views: 60.4K · Uploaded: May 2026 · Length: 41 minutes

Open on YouTube

Why many Georgia cases stay unidentified

Many Georgia sightings remain unidentified for a simple reason: the record is incomplete. The word “unidentified” often means “not enough information to identify”, not “beyond known science”. This is especially true for old reports, brief light sightings, and database entries with no photograph, no radar, no independent witness statements and no follow-up investigation.

Georgia’s aviation environment complicates the record. Atlanta is one of the most active aviation areas in the United States, and the state also has military aviation connections, regional airports, training routes and busy night skies. A witness may honestly report a silent, hovering, zigzagging or fast-moving light, while the apparent behaviour is shaped by distance, cloud, viewing angle, aircraft lights, atmospheric conditions or the lack of a fixed reference point.

Modern sky clutter adds another layer. AARO’s historical review notes that older UFO reports were often explained by afterburners, satellites, missiles, reflections, searchlights, birds, kites, false radar returns, fireworks, flares and hoaxes. Today, drones and satellite constellations add more opportunities for sincere misidentification, especially when people see lights in formation or moving in unfamiliar ways. [U.S. Department of War]war.govdod examining unidentified anomalous phenomenadod examining unidentified anomalous phenomena

Delayed reporting is one of the biggest weaknesses in Georgia databases. A person may remember a striking light over Savannah in 1986, a triangle near Warner Robins in 1993, or an odd object near Macon in the 1970s, but if the account is filed years later, investigators cannot easily reconstruct sky conditions, aircraft movements, local events or the witness’s original uncertainty. NUFORC’s Georgia index includes many entries where the occurred date and reported date are far apart, which makes those cases useful as folklore or witness testimony but much weaker as evidence. [NUFORC]nuforc.orgOpen source on nuforc.org.

The 1973 Georgia wave shows the tension clearly. Reports from Macon and South Georgia are historically important because they were clustered, public and locally reported. Yet the surviving record is still uneven: some witnesses were named by role, some accounts are summarised through newspapers, and many lack the kind of triangulated physical data that would let a modern investigator distinguish aircraft, astronomical objects, atmospheric effects and truly anomalous movement. [Macon Telegraph]macon.comSource details in endnotes.

Records illustration 2

How to read Georgia sighting maps without being misled

Sightings maps are tempting because they look precise. A cluster of markers around Atlanta, Macon, Savannah, Augusta or north Georgia can seem to imply a hotspot. Sometimes it may. But maps of UFO reports often show population density, internet access, media attention, outdoor activity, local culture, and database popularity as much as unusual aerial events.

Axios Atlanta, using NUFORC data, reported that metro Atlanta had a lower sighting rate per 100,000 residents from 2000 to 2023 than the national average, while Fulton, Gwinnett and Cobb counties had the highest raw county counts in the metro area. That is a useful caution: a large city may produce many reports simply because more people are looking up, filing reports and living under busy flight paths. [Axios]axios.comMapped: UFO sightings in GeorgiaMapped: UFO sightings in Georgia

Local media summaries can help readers find patterns, but they should not be treated as case investigations. WSB Radio reported in 2023 that Georgia had more than 2,600 NUFORC-listed sightings and that Atlanta had 170 reports, with the earliest Atlanta entry dating back to 1951. Those figures are helpful for scale, but a count of reports is not a count of unexplained objects. [95.5 WSB]wsbradio.comSource details in endnotes.

The same caution applies to app-based systems. Enigma’s Georgia page and wider database are helpful for browsing modern and historical material, and its app claims tools such as metadata capture and identification features for known objects. Those are improvements over loose storytelling, but the system still depends heavily on public submissions, user behaviour, proprietary scoring choices and the quality of uploaded media. [Enigma Labs]enigmalabs.ioSource details in endnotes. Report a UFO sighting

A good rule for Georgia maps is to ask what the marker actually represents. Is it a same-night multi-witness event? A single witness? A report imported from another database? A delayed memory? A video with metadata? A newspaper item? A pilot report? A map point should be treated as an invitation to inspect the underlying record, not as evidence by itself.

NASA UFO report finds no evidence UAP have extraterrestrial origins | FULL

Channel: Global News · Views: 37.7K · Uploaded: September 2023 · Length: 59 minutes

Open on YouTube

Witness reliability: credibility is not the same as identification

Georgia has several reports involving witnesses who sound credible: law-enforcement observers, pilots, firefighters, public officials and ordinary residents with no obvious reason to invent a story. That matters. It is unfair to dismiss witnesses simply because their account is strange. But it is also a mistake to treat sincerity as proof of correct identification.

The Carter sighting is the clearest Georgia example. Carter was a serious public figure, his report is archived, and the sighting became part of national political and UFO history. Yet the case is still disputed because the event was reported years later, the date is uncertain, and later analyses have proposed ordinary or at least non-extraterrestrial explanations. The lesson is not that Carter lied; it is that a trustworthy witness can still leave behind an unresolved and debatable record. [National Archives]archives.govNational Archives Project BLUE BOOKNational Archives Project BLUE BOOK

Pilot reports deserve careful attention because pilots are trained observers of the sky, but even they are not immune to ambiguity. A NUFORC Atlanta report from 2023 identifies the witnesses as pilots and places the event during take-off from Hartsfield-Jackson. That context makes the report more serious than a vague backyard sighting, but it still requires corroboration: flight path, weather, traffic, cockpit workload, possible ground lights, satellites, other aircraft and any available sensor data all matter. [NUFORC]nuforc.orgOpen source on nuforc.org.

NASA’s UAP report is especially relevant here because it avoids both extremes. It does not say witness reports are worthless; it says they can show patterns but need calibrated supporting data to become conclusive. For Georgia readers, that is the practical middle ground: listen to witnesses carefully, preserve their accounts, then test the account against independent information wherever possible. [NASA Science]science.nasa.govScience Independent Study Team ReportScience Independent Study Team Report

MUFON – The Truth Behind UFOs and Alien Encounters

Channel: J. Horton Films · Views: 48.3K · Uploaded: January 2023 · Length: 50 minutes

Open on YouTube

A practical reliability scale for Georgia records

A reader trying to judge a Georgia UFO entry can sort it into rough reliability tiers. This does not “solve” the case, but it helps separate historically interesting material from stronger evidence.

Stronger records include prompt reports with exact time, location, direction, duration, multiple independent witnesses, photographs or video with metadata, aviation context, and documented checks against aircraft, satellites, weather and astronomy. A pilot or law-enforcement witness can add weight, but only when the rest of the record is specific enough to test.

Moderate records include named or role-identified witnesses, same-night local reporting, several consistent accounts from nearby communities, or newspaper coverage close to the event. The 1973 Middle and South Georgia reports often sit in this middle zone: historically significant and worth preserving, but not usually supported by the kind of technical data needed for firm conclusions. [Macon Telegraph]macon.comSource details in endnotes.

Weak records include single-witness memories filed long after the event, reports with no direction or duration, claims based mainly on emotional impact, or descriptions that could fit common sky objects. Many database entries are still worth reading, but they should not be inflated into evidence of extraordinary craft.

Poor or contaminated records include copied stories with no original source, social-media retellings detached from the first witness, vague claims attached to famous places, and cases where later versions add details not present in the earliest account. Carter’s case shows why this matters: even a famous report can become distorted through later retellings, date confusion and secondary summaries. [Wikipedia]WikipediaJimmy Carter UFO incidentJimmy Carter UFO incident

Records illustration 3

What Georgia’s records can and cannot prove

Georgia’s UFO databases and archives prove that people across the state have repeatedly reported unusual things in the sky, from mid-century federal cases to the 1973 wave, the Carter report, modern NUFORC entries, and app-based sightings. They also show that UFO reporting is shaped by where people live, what they expect, what the media is covering, how easy it is to file a report, and what ordinary aerial objects are present at the time.

They do not prove that Georgia has been visited by extraterrestrial craft. AARO’s recent public position is that many UAP cases resolve to ordinary objects and that only a small percentage require deeper scientific inquiry; NASA likewise found that existing UAP data is often too limited and that better observations are needed. Those conclusions fit Georgia’s record well: the interesting question is often not “which case proves aliens?” but “which cases have enough information to remain genuinely unresolved after ordinary explanations are checked?” [U.S. Department of War]war.govdod examining unidentified anomalous phenomenadod examining unidentified anomalous phenomena

The most responsible use of Georgia’s UFO records is therefore comparative. NUFORC helps identify report patterns. Newspaper archives help reconstruct what was known at the time. Federal archives establish which older cases were officially collected. Enigma and similar platforms may improve modern reporting by standardising submissions and capturing media, but they still need independent verification. Together, these sources make Georgia a useful case study in how UFO history is built: not from one perfect archive, but from many imperfect records that must be read carefully against each other.

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

Books and field guides related to How Reliable Are Georgia's UFO Records and Databases?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.

Browse more on Amazon: The UFO Experience The Report on Unidentified Flying Objects UFOs

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

eBay marketplace picks

Marketplace Samples

Example marketplace items related to this page. Use the search link to explore similar finds on eBay.

Using USA
Browse more on eBay.com

Example items shown for inspiration; availability and pricing can change. Branchoria may earn a commission if you purchase through outbound eBay links.

Browse more on eBay.co.uk

Example items shown for inspiration; availability and pricing can change. Branchoria may earn a commission if you purchase through outbound eBay links.

Endnotes

  1. Source: nuforc.org
    Link: https://nuforc.org/subndx/?id=lGA

  2. Source: enigmalabs.io
    Link: https://enigmalabs.io/explore/ge

  3. Source: enigmalabs.io
    Link: https://enigmalabs.io/explore

  4. Source: archives.gov
    Title: National Archives Project BLUE BOOK
    Link: https://www.archives.gov/research/military/air-force/ufos

  5. Source: macon.com
    Link: https://www.macon.com/news/local/article229804369.html

  6. Source: macon.com
    Link: https://www.macon.com/news/local/article229959549.html

  7. Source: nuforc.org
    Link: https://nuforc.org/sighting/?id=11257

  8. Source: nuforc.org
    Link: https://nuforc.org/sighting/?id=176033

  9. Source: newspapers.com
    Title: tallahassee democrat south georgia ufo 1
    Link: https://www.newspapers.com/article/tallahassee-democrat-south-georgia-ufo-1/35888701/

  10. Source: archives.gov
    Title: National Archives Do Records Show Proof of UFOs?
    Link: https://www.archives.gov/news/articles/do-records-show-proof-of-ufos

  11. Source: Wikipedia
    Title: Jimmy Carter UFO incident
    Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Carter_UFO_incident

  12. Source: science.nasa.gov
    Title: Science Independent Study Team Report
    Link: https://science.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/uap-independent-study-team-final-report.pdf

  13. Source: aaro.mil
    Link: https://www.aaro.mil/

  14. Source: war.gov
    Title: dod examining unidentified anomalous phenomena
    Link: https://www.war.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/3965403/dod-examining-unidentified-anomalous-phenomena/

  15. Source: axios.com
    Title: Mapped: UFO sightings in Georgia
    Link: https://www.axios.com/local/atlanta/2024/02/26/georgia-ufo-sightings

  16. Source: wsbradio.com
    Link: https://www.wsbradio.com/news/local/there-have-been-more-than-2600-reported-ufo-sightings-georgia-heres-where/NCTKJ43RERHCRHA444K6YXA3QU/

  17. Source: history.com
    Title: carter files report on ufo sighting
    Link: https://www.history.com/this-day-in-history/september-18/carter-files-report-on-ufo-sighting

  18. Source: aaro.mil
    Title: UNCLASSIFIED FY23 Consolidated Annual Report on UAP Oct 25 2023 1236
    Link: https://www.aaro.mil/Portals/136/PDFs/UNCLASSIFIED-FY23_Consolidated_Annual_Report_on_UAP-Oct_25_2023_1236.pdf

  19. Source: aaro.mil
    Link: https://www.aaro.mil/Portals/136/PDFs/AARO_Mission_Brief_2025.pdf

  20. Source: aaro.mil
    Link: https://www.aaro.mil/UAP-Cases/Official-UAP-Imagery/

  21. Source: nuforc.org
    Link: https://nuforc.org/

  22. Source: nuforc.org
    Link: https://nuforc.org/sighting/?id=68188

  23. Source: nuforc.org
    Link: https://nuforc.org/ndx/?id=loc

  24. Source: nuforc.org
    Link: https://nuforc.org/sighting/?id=29229

  25. Source: nuforc.org
    Link: https://nuforc.org/map/

  26. Source: nuforc.org
    Link: https://nuforc.org/sighting/?id=135209

  27. Source: nuforc.org
    Link: https://nuforc.org/sighting/?id=74682

  28. Source: nuforc.org
    Link: https://nuforc.org/sighting/?id=61559

  29. Source: nuforc.org
    Link: https://nuforc.org/sighting/?id=110892

  30. Source: nuforc.org
    Link: https://nuforc.org/subndx/?id=all

  31. Source: nuforc.org
    Link: https://nuforc.org/sighting/?id=38792

  32. Source: nuforc.org
    Link: https://nuforc.org/sighting/?id=144411

  33. Source: nuforc.org
    Link: https://nuforc.org/sighting/?id=154388

  34. Source: nuforc.org
    Link: https://nuforc.org/sighting/?id=60605

  35. Source: nuforc.org
    Link: https://nuforc.org/sighting/?id=120196

  36. Source: nuforc.org
    Link: https://nuforc.org/sighting/?id=101662

  37. Source: nuforc.org
    Link: https://nuforc.org/sighting/?id=126835

  38. Source: mufon.com
    Link: https://mufon.com/2025/11/28/what-about-all-those-uso-sightings-since-august-in-the-media-the-real-story-by-bob-spearing/

  39. Source: mufon.com
    Title: Mufon April 2023 Journal
    Link: https://mufon.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/Mufon-April-2023-Journal.pdf
    Published: April 2023

  40. Source: mufon.com
    Link: https://mufon.com/what-is-ufology/

  41. Source: archive.org
    Title: 1949 07 6310493 Valdosta Georgia 407
    Link: https://archive.org/details/1949-07-6310493-Valdosta-Georgia-407-

  42. Source: Wikipedia
    Title: List of reported UFO sightings
    Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_reported_UFO_sightings

  43. Source: Wikipedia
    Title: Pascagoula incident
    Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pascagoula_incident

  44. Source: archives.gov
    Title: rg collections
    Link: https://www.archives.gov/research/topics/uaps/rg-collections

  45. Source: macon.com
    Link: https://www.macon.com/news/state/georgia/article314318198.html

  46. Source: documents.theblackvault.com
    Title: Carter UFO
    Link: https://documents.theblackvault.com/documents/ufos/CarterUFO.pdf

  47. Source: media.defense.gov
    Title: DOPSR 2024 0263 AARO HISTORICAL RECORD REPORT VOLUME 1 2024
    Link: https://media.defense.gov/2024/Mar/08/2003409233/-1/-1/0/DOPSR-2024-0263-AARO-HISTORICAL-RECORD-REPORT-VOLUME-1-2024.PDF

  48. Source: enigmalabs.io
    Link: https://enigmalabs.io/explore/gs

  49. Source: enigmalabs.io
    Link: https://enigmalabs.io/explore/united-states

  50. Source: enigmalabs.io
    Title: large triangle ufos
    Link: https://enigmalabs.io/blog/large-triangle-ufos

  51. Source: enigmalabs.io
    Title: the benefits of crowdsourcing ufo data
    Link: https://enigmalabs.io/blog/the-benefits-of-crowdsourcing-ufo-data

  52. Source: enigmalabs.io
    Link: https://enigmalabs.io/

  53. Source: enigmalabs.io
    Title: 12000 uap sightings and counting
    Link: https://enigmalabs.io/blog/12000-uap-sightings-and-counting

  54. Source: uk.forceswarrecords.com
    Link: https://uk.forceswarrecords.com/document/9169583

  55. Source: facebook.com
    Link: https://www.facebook.com/NewsNationNow/posts/enigma-labs-collects-videos-submitted-by-people-who-have-seen-ufos/873020898438262/

  56. Source: play.google.com
    Link: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?hl=en_GB&id=com.enigma.mobile

  57. Source: ufodatalive.com
    Link: https://www.ufodatalive.com/states/georgia/

  58. Source: sentientorbs.com
    Title: NUFORC 38792
    Link: https://sentientorbs.com/explore/sightings/NUFORC-38792

Additional References

  1. Source: youtube.com
    Title: MUFON – The Truth Behind UFOs and Alien Encounters
    Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PSgTuE7HFx0
    Source snippet

    Ancient Aliens: TRUTH UNCOVERED By UFO Investigation (Season 19) | History...

  2. Source: youtube.com
    Title: All the videos from Pentagon’s first batch of UFO files
    Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WpRWkuYu9V8
    Source snippet

    MUFON – The Truth Behind UFOs and Alien Encounters...

  3. Source: facebook.com
    Link: https://www.facebook.com/groups/617328327480084/posts/834804162399165/

  4. Source: researchgate.net
    Link: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/395858774_Toward_a_Reliability_Scale_for_Assessing_Reports_of_Unidentified_Anomalous_Phenomena_UAP

  5. Source: facebook.com
    Link: https://www.facebook.com/PSLMissouri/posts/a-new-ufo-stalker-map-on-the-mufon-website-which-hosts-thousands-upon-thousands-/10155239202564506/

  6. Source: facebook.com
    Link: https://www.facebook.com/NewsNationNow/posts/a-video-sharing-platform-run-by-enigma-labs-is-storing-images-of-unidentified-an/873015845105434/

  7. Source: mufongeorgia.org
    Link: https://mufongeorgia.org/about-mufon-georgia/

  8. Source: reddit.com
    Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/1ftu6kg/did_anybody_else_get_contacted_by_enigma_labs_for/

  9. Source: facebook.com
    Link: https://www.facebook.com/groups/828178678983076/posts/1402115054922766/

  10. Source: sacred-texts.com
    Link: https://sacred-texts.com/ufo/carter.htm

Topic Tree

Follow this branch

Parent topic

Georgia UFOs

Related pages 3

More on this topic 2