Within Pennsylvania UFOs

When Western Pennsylvania Filled With Reports

The 1973 wave mixed UFO reports, police calls, creature stories, and local investigation into a complicated regional flap.

On this page

  • How the reporting wave unfolded
  • Police, media, and volunteer investigators
  • Why mixed phenomena complicate the case
Preview for When Western Pennsylvania Filled With Reports

Introduction

Western Pennsylvania’s 1973 UFO flap was not one single sighting with one tidy explanation. It was a regional reporting wave in which unusual lights, alleged low-flying objects, police calls, local press interest, volunteer investigators and “creature” stories became tangled together across the western part of the state, especially around Westmoreland and Fayette counties. Its best-known case came near Uniontown on 25 October 1973, when witnesses claimed to see a large red object descend near a pasture and then reported tall, hairy figures near a fence line. The case matters in Pennsylvania UFO history because it shows how a flap works: separate reports pile up, investigators try to sort them, and the boundary between skywatching, folklore, fear and evidence becomes difficult to police.

Overview image for 1973 Flap The fairest reading is cautious. Some 1973 reports may have had ordinary causes such as planets, aircraft, meteors, satellites, balloons, lanterns or misperceived animals. Even Stan Gordon, the Greensburg investigator most associated with the flap, has said that a high percentage of strange reports turn out to have natural or man-made explanations. But the 1973 wave remains notable because witnesses, local authorities and private investigators treated at least some reports as serious enough to document, revisit and argue over for decades. [Herald-Standard]heraldstandard.comfayette countys encounterfayette countys encounter

How the reporting wave unfolded

The 1973 flap sat inside a larger American UFO surge. By then, the US Air Force’s public Project Blue Book programme had already ended; it was terminated in December 1969 after collecting 12,618 reports from 1947 to 1969, of which 701 remained “unidentified”. The Air Force’s official conclusion was not that unexplained cases were extraterrestrial, but that investigated sightings showed no evidence of national-security threat, unknown technology or extraterrestrial vehicles. That left post-Blue Book waves such as 1973 largely in the hands of local police, newspapers, private UFO groups and independent investigators. [U.S. Air Force]af.milUnidentified Flying Objects and Air Force Project Blue Book > Air Force > Fact Sheet Display…

In Pennsylvania, Gordon later described the 1970s as an especially active period, with “multitudes” of reports during 1973 and coverage by local and statewide newspapers. His account is important, but it is also a reminder that the source base is uneven: many details come from private investigation files, retrospective interviews and later summaries rather than a single official case file. [Stan Gordon]stangordon.infoSource details in endnotes.

The reports were not all of the same kind. Some were classic UFO claims: lights, glowing spheres, low hovering objects or objects that allegedly affected cars. Others moved into “high strangeness”: huge footprints, frightened animals, hairy bipedal figures and stories in which UFOs and creatures appeared close together in time or place. A publisher’s description of Gordon’s book Silent Invasion: The Pennsylvania UFO-Bigfoot Casebook frames the wave this way: UFOs were reported across Pennsylvania in 1973, and by summer “huge hairy Bigfoot-like creatures” were also being reported over a wide area, with frightened residents calling local authorities and media outlets. [Indigo]indigo.caSource details in endnotes.

That mixture is why the flap is best understood as a case family, not a single case. A single bright light in the sky can often be checked against astronomy, aviation and weather. A cluster involving sky objects, animal reactions, police referrals, alleged landing traces and creature claims is much harder to evaluate because the evidence types do not fit one standard test.

1973 Flap illustration 1

The Uniontown case became the flap’s central story

The case most often used to represent the western Pennsylvania flap occurred on 25 October 1973 in countryside near Uniontown, in Fayette County. In a later local newspaper account, officials discussing the incident referred questions to Gordon, who had investigated it and become closely associated with the file. [Herald-Standard]heraldstandard.comfayette countys encounterfayette countys encounter

The basic reported sequence is striking. Gordon said about 15 people saw a large red object moving slowly towards the ground around 9 p.m. A farmer’s son and two boys then went towards a pasture, heard high-pitched whining or baby-like sounds, and saw what was described as a bright white half-sphere or dome, either on or just above the ground, roughly 250 feet away. [Herald-Standard]heraldstandard.comfayette countys encounterfayette countys encounter

The creature element then enters the story. According to Gordon’s account in the Herald-Standard, the witnesses noticed two tall figures near a barbed-wire fence about 75 feet away. The fence posts were said to be six feet tall; one figure was described as more than eight feet tall and the second as more than seven feet. The figures were reported as upright, hairy, long-armed, dark and matted, with no visible neck and glowing green eyes. [Herald-Standard]heraldstandard.comfayette countys encounterfayette countys encounter

The story escalated further when one of the witnesses reportedly fired tracers above the figures and then fired at them. Gordon’s retelling says the larger figure made a whining sound and reached towards the tracer; at that moment, the object disappeared, the sound stopped, and a luminous area was visible on the ground. The witnesses then ran back and called state police. [Herald-Standard]heraldstandard.comfayette countys encounterfayette countys encounter

Gordon’s own later summary adds the most evidentially interesting detail: he wrote that a state trooper from the Uniontown barracks called his UFO hotline at about 10.30 p.m. after investigating the report. Gordon said the officer told him the area where the object had been was glowing, estimated at more than 100 feet in diameter, extending up from about a foot off the ground, and that farm animals would not approach it. Gordon also stated that his team reached the scene within hours. [Stan Gordon]stangordon.infoSource details in endnotes.

For readers, the important distinction is between “reported” and “established”. The Uniontown case is well known because it includes multiple witnesses, a claimed police response and a claimed physical trace. But the public record still relies heavily on Gordon’s summaries and later retellings. That makes it historically significant within Pennsylvania UFO lore, but not independently proven as a landed craft, an unknown creature or a linked UFO-creature event.

Police, media and volunteer investigators shaped the flap

Western Pennsylvania’s 1973 wave did not become famous simply because people saw odd things. It became a flap because reports travelled through institutions: police barracks, local newspapers, hotlines, volunteer groups and eventually books, lectures and paranormal archives.

Gordon is the central figure in that chain. Based in Greensburg, he began investigating UFO and paranormal reports as a teenager and later organised volunteer groups before continuing as an independent investigator. The Herald-Standard noted that officials discussing the Fayette County case treated it as “Stan’s case”, which says a great deal about how local memory and private investigation became intertwined. [Herald-Standard]heraldstandard.comfayette countys encounterfayette countys encounter

His role cuts both ways. On one hand, without Gordon and his associates, many reports from the period might have vanished into police logs, family stories or local gossip. His later work preserved names, dates, locations, sketches, witness sequences and field-investigation claims. His 1974 MUFON symposium paper, “UFOs in Relation to Creature Sightings in Pennsylvania”, became one of the early attempts to document the overlap between UFO and creature reports in the state. [Stan Gordon]stangordon.infoSource details in endnotes.

On the other hand, private case files are not the same as a controlled official investigation. They can preserve valuable testimony, but they also depend on witness memory, investigator judgement, selective survival of records and later interpretation. A balanced account should neither dismiss them automatically nor treat them as proof.

Media coverage added another layer. Local journalism gave the flap public shape, but press interest can also amplify a wave. Once newspapers, radio stations or police dispatchers start receiving reports, people who might otherwise ignore a light in the sky may interpret it through the current story. That does not mean all witnesses are wrong; it means a flap is partly a social process as well as an observational one.

1973 Flap illustration 2

Why mixed phenomena complicate the case

The 1973 western Pennsylvania flap is difficult because it combines different categories of claim that normally require different standards of evidence.

A light in the sky can be compared with known celestial bodies, aircraft routes, satellites, weather balloons, military activity, meteors or atmospheric effects. A low object near a farm might be checked through physical traces, photographs, radiation readings, soil disturbance, animal behaviour, weather conditions and witness distance. A giant hairy figure near a fence line raises still other possibilities: misidentified animals, hoaxing, fear under poor lighting, folklore influence, or an unknown physical creature claim that would require biological evidence.

When all of these appear together, the case can feel stronger to believers because it seems too strange to be coincidence. But it can also become weaker analytically because each added element creates a new uncertainty. Did the witnesses correctly judge size and distance at night? Were the “creatures” seen clearly, or partly inferred from shape, sound and movement? Was the glowing ground independently documented, photographed or sampled in a way that survives? Did police confirm all details, or did later retellings fold several impressions into one dramatic sequence?

Sceptical interpretations often focus on this compounding problem. Joe Nickell, writing in Skeptical Inquirer, places the Uniontown report within a broader 1970s trend in which Bigfoot and UFO stories became linked in popular and paranormal writing. He notes that during the 1970s some UFOlogists moved into Bigfoot material, and he cites the Uniontown case as one example of reports where a red-glowing sphere and Bigfoot-like figures appeared in the same narrative. [Skeptical Inquirer]skepticalinquirer.orgSource details in endnotes.

That sceptical frame does not prove the Uniontown witnesses invented their story. It does, however, show why the case cannot be read in isolation. By 1973, American UFO culture, Bigfoot culture and “high strangeness” publishing were already feeding each other. Western Pennsylvania’s flap sits right at that crossroads.

What the best evidence does and does not show

The strongest evidence for the flap is not a single photograph or official conclusion. It is the persistence and density of witness reporting, the involvement of local police referrals in at least some accounts, and the fact that the same regional investigator network documented multiple reports across a short period.

The Uniontown case has several features that make it more substantial than an ordinary rumour: a specific date, a specific county setting, multiple claimed witnesses, a claimed state police contact, an alleged ground glow and rapid investigator response. Gordon’s 2021 summary states that the trooper contacted him after investigating the incident, and that Gordon’s team arrived within hours. [Stan Gordon]stangordon.infoSource details in endnotes.

The weaker side is equally important. The most dramatic details remain largely dependent on witness accounts and investigator retellings. Publicly accessible evidence does not establish a recovered object, a verified unknown animal, a scientific soil analysis, or an official finding that something extraordinary landed near Uniontown. Later summaries repeat the story, but repetition is not the same as independent corroboration.

Gordon himself has publicly acknowledged the need for caution. In the Herald-Standard article, he said many UFO or strange-creature reports may initially seem unusual but later prove to have natural or man-made explanations, naming bright planets, stars, satellites, meteorites and lanterns among possible causes. That caution should be applied to the 1973 flap as a whole. [Herald-Standard]heraldstandard.comfayette countys encounterfayette countys encounter

The most defensible conclusion is that western Pennsylvania experienced a genuine reporting wave in 1973: people really did make many reports, some reports reached police and investigators, and the wave became an important part of the state’s UFO history. What remains unproven is the extraordinary interpretation that UFOs and unknown creatures were physically present and connected.

1973 Flap illustration 3

Why 1973 still matters in Pennsylvania UFO history

The western Pennsylvania flap matters because it shows a different side of the state’s UFO tradition from Kecksburg or Presque Isle. Kecksburg centres on a disputed crash narrative from 1965. Presque Isle matters partly because of its place in Project Blue Book-era records. The 1973 flap is different: it is a post-Blue Book, regional, citizen-driven wave, where local police and private investigators became the main filters for public uncertainty.

It also shows why Pennsylvania’s UFO history cannot be reduced to “real” versus “fake”. A flap may include misidentifications, exaggerations, sincere fear, social contagion, ambiguous physical traces and a few incidents that remain hard to explain. The hard part is not choosing one label for the whole wave; it is sorting each report by evidential strength.

The 1973 cases also shaped later Pennsylvania paranormal culture. Gordon’s books and lectures kept the period alive, while sceptical writers used the same material to discuss how Bigfoot and UFO traditions merged in the 1970s. That double legacy is why the flap remains useful. It can be read as a serious local investigation history, a folklore case study, a media-amplified reporting wave, or a cautionary example of how mixed phenomena can overwhelm neat explanation.

For a Pennsylvania UFO project, the best placement of the 1973 flap is therefore neither “solved hoax” nor “confirmed invasion”. It belongs in the middle category: historically important, heavily reported, locally distinctive, but evidentially messy. Its value lies in showing how western Pennsylvania briefly became a place where lights in the sky, frightened farm families, police calls, creature reports and volunteer investigation all converged into one of the state’s strangest UFO chapters.

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

Books and field guides related to When Western Pennsylvania Filled With Reports. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.

eBay marketplace picks

Marketplace Samples

Example marketplace items related to this page. Use the search link to explore similar finds on eBay.

Using USA

Endnotes

  1. Source: heraldstandard.com
    Title: fayette countys encounter
    Link: https://www.heraldstandard.com/news/2014/oct/07/fayette-countys-encounter/

  2. Source: stangordon.info
    Link: https://www.stangordon.info/wp/2021/06/07/the-government-needs-to-be-more-forthcoming-about-the-ongoing-ufo-mystery-ufo-sightings-reported-yearly-in-pennsylvania/

  3. Source: af.mil
    Title: U.S. Air Force
    Link: https://www.af.mil/About-Us/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/104590/unidentified-flying-objects-and-air-force-project-blue-book/
    Source snippet

    Unidentified Flying Objects and Air Force Project Blue Book > Air Force > Fact Sheet Display...

  4. Source: indigo.ca
    Link: https://www.indigo.ca/products/silent-invasion-4

  5. Source: stangordon.info
    Link: https://stangordon.info/stangordon.htm

  6. Source: skepticalinquirer.org
    Link: https://skepticalinquirer.org/2017/09/bigfoot-as-big-myth-seven-phases-of-mythmaking/

  7. Source: Wikipedia
    Title: Project Blue Book
    Link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Blue_Book

  8. Source: abebooks.co.uk
    Title: Silent Invasion: The Pennsylvania UFO-Bigfoot Casebook
    Link: https://www.abebooks.co.uk/9780966610833/Silent-Invasion-Pennsylvania-UFO-Bigfoot-Casebook-0966610830/plp

  9. Source: history.com
    Title: americas first ufo sighting
    Link: https://www.history.com/articles/americas-first-ufo-sighting

  10. Source: history.com
    Title: of UFOs
    Link: https://www.history.com/articles/history-of-ufos

  11. Source: history.com
    Title: s most infamous ufo sightings
    Link: https://www.history.com/articles/historys-most-infamous-ufo-sightings

  12. Source: facebook.com
    Link: https://www.facebook.com/groups/484025020082/posts/10168417060650083/

  13. Source: facebook.com
    Link: https://www.facebook.com/groups/3238587069499399/posts/24155138130750988/

  14. Source: facebook.com
    Link: https://www.facebook.com/groups/3238587069499399/posts/9094621143895933/

  15. Source: facebook.com
    Link: https://www.facebook.com/groups/1072965459548818/posts/2893566947488651/

  16. Source: facebook.com
    Link: https://www.facebook.com/groups/679528593379841/posts/1148778973121465/

  17. Source: archives.gov
    Title: Project BLUE BOOK
    Link: https://www.archives.gov/research/military/air-force/ufos

  18. Source: post-gazette.com
    Link: https://www.post-gazette.com/news/science/2015/12/06/50-years-later-the-kecksburg-westmoreland-county-ufo-is-identified-probably/stories/201512060146

  19. Source: keystonebigfoot.wixsite.com
    Title: Fayette County | Keystone Bigfoot.com
    Link: https://keystonebigfoot.wixsite.com/website/fayette-county

  20. Source: nuforc.org
    Link: https://nuforc.org/sighting/?id=54491

  21. Source: britannica.com
    Title: Project Blue Book
    Link: https://www.britannica.com/topic/Project-Blue-Book

  22. Source: news.sky.com
    Title: ufo abductee still haunted 40 years on 10431808
    Link: https://news.sky.com/story/ufo-abductee-still-haunted-40-years-on-10431808

  23. Source: sharonahill.com
    Link: https://sharonahill.com/bigfoot/

  24. Source: stangordon.info
    Link: https://www.stangordon.info/wp/

  25. Source: stangordon.info
    Link: https://www.stangordon.info/wp/2024/01/17/2023-a-major-year-for-ufo-uap-bigfoot-cryptid-reports-and-other-mysterious-activity-in-pennsylvania/

  26. Source: pod.wave.co
    Link: https://pod.wave.co/podcast/bigfoot-collectors-club/supercut-the-pennsylvaniabigfoot-ufo-invasion-w-steve-berg

  27. Source: pod.wave.co
    Title: co”The Pennsylvania Bigfoot/UFO Invasion
    Link: https://pod.wave.co/podcast/bigfoot-collectors-club/the-pennsylvania-bigfootufo-invasion-part-i-w-steve-berg-9de81bf8

  28. Source: books.google.com
    Title: Silent Invasion
    Link: https://books.google.com/books/about/Silent_Invasion.html?id=hMf3TgEACAAJ

Additional References

  1. Source: youtube.com
    Title: Kecksburg UFO Festival
    Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TTDVTCwdKQ0
    Source snippet

    What Caused This Helicopter To Ascend 1800 Feet in 10 Seconds?! | UFO Witness | Travel Channel...

  2. Source: youtube.com
    Title: Discussing Silent Invasion The Pennsylvania UFO-Bigfoot Casebook
    Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HTk1ZWk5FjI
    Source snippet

    Kecksburg UFO Festival - ft Stan Gordon | Alien Investigators & Bigfoot Society...

  3. Source: youtube.com
    Link: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DweWvCUv0tM
    Source snippet

    The Great UFO Invasion of Appalachia...

  4. Source: reddit.com
    Link: https://www.reddit.com/r/Cryptozoology/comments/1l42u7k/a_rather_bizarre_bigfoot_sighting_from/

  5. Source: facebook.com
    Link: https://www.facebook.com/groups/acfa.cryptozoology/posts/2120962071600134/

  6. Source: instagram.com
    Link: https://www.instagram.com/reel/DMRXk3muHJx/

  7. Source: archive.org
    Link: https://archive.org/stream/Cryptozoology_201608/Cryptozoology_djvu.txt

  8. Source: etsy.com
    Link: https://www.etsy.com/listing/1754689881/kecksburg-ufo-newspaper-headline-art

  9. Source: instagram.com
    Link: https://www.instagram.com/p/DTf4j9IDh0Y/

  10. Source: biblio.co.uk
    Link: https://biblio.co.uk/book/1676563465

Topic Tree

Follow this branch

Parent topic

Pennsylvania UFOs

Related pages 3

More on this topic 2